Dangerous Drivers (especially cabs)

bigjl

PCMcGarry wrote: »

It will be hard for someone to prove you wrong when you've yet to prove yourself right.

You just post any old !!!!! and slag off anyone who dares question you.

Just because you keep spouting your crap it doesn't make it right. Post some facts if you want to stop being considered a laughing stock.

What have you ever added to this forum?

It seems to me you are one of those posters that stalks other posters and tries to start of mud slinging matches!

Prove me wrong!

Go on.

I don't have to justify or prove things that I know to be factual.

You can't link to a Wikipedia article when you are basing your opinions and statements on information gleaned over many years.

When you grow up a bit you will understand that the longer you live the more you know.

It is that simple.

Now prove me wrong.

bigjl

PCMcGarry wrote: »

Stop ranting you idiot.

You really are pointless aren't you

PCMcGarry

bigjl wrote: »

What have you ever added to this forum?

It seems to me you are one of those posters that stalks other posters and tries to start of mud slinging matches!

Prove me wrong!

Go on.

I don't have to justify or prove things that I know to be factual.

You can't link to a Wikipedia article when you are basing your opinions and statements on information gleaned over many years.

When you grow up a bit you will understand that the longer you live the more you know.

It is that simple.

Now prove me wrong.

Prove what wrong? The fact you just post crap and rant.

It's clear for everyone to see.

End of conversation.

Goodbye. :wave:

Hermione_Granger

Instead of posting that last load of drivel bigjl, why not simply admit that your previous post stating that the LPHCA was "nothing to do with operators" was incorrect?

All that last post of yours has done is to show that you think insulting others will help prove your point.
It doesn't. All it proves is that your argument has no merit whatsoever and when proven wrong, you try to divert the topic.

bigjl

Hermione_Granger wrote: »

Instead of posting that last load of drivel bigjl, why not simply admit that your previous post stating that the LPHCA was "nothing to do with operators" was incorrect?

All that last post of yours has done is to show that you think insulting others will help prove your point.
It doesn't. All it proves is that your argument has no merit whatsoever and when proven wrong, you try to divert the topic.

Are you sure this isn't what I said?

"The LPHCA are only interested in making PH drivers stick with one company so that that company can do what they like when they like.

Which is why LPHCA only have Operators as members and are closely linked to Addison Lee."

As that is a direct quote from my initial post.

bigjl

Still waiting Hermoine?

Where is this post that you have "quoted" me from?

My memory is not what it was when I was a little boy.

But I must admit I can't see why I would post the statement you have "quoted" as I have always know that LPHCA is Operator only.

Though they have indeed been quoted in the PH Trade press as "representing" thousands of PH drivers. And when challenged they then said what they meant was they "represent" the interest of PH Operators with that many drivers.

Not really the same thing.

And certainly not listed on their website.

From memory the statement was in The Chauffeur magazine or PH&C Mag. I think it was also reprinted in Pro Driver Mag but I can't honestly remember.

The comments themselves where a hot topic for debate regardless of where published.

They made the comment in the context of an Anti Uber article if memory serves.

And no I won't give chapter and verse on the article.

Look it up yourself if you don't believe me.

bigjl

Though in interest of balance I thought I would put up another comment regarding the name of LPHCA.

And my comment afterwards relating to the name of the organisation.

"It is called the Licenced private hire car association.

Nothing to do with Operators."

You see context is everything.

For the record that was post #44

And Went on to make other points regarding how the LPHCA has tried to enslave drivers with unfair working conditions.

You can't take a tiny section of a post out of context to prove a point.

As all it proves is that you never read the entire post and also never actually understood the point of the post.

You need to read the post as a whole.

Though it does show that you are little more than a troll more interested in starting arguments than actually debating real issues

I suspect that you have no interest whatsoever in the fact that many PH driver struggle through day to day earning buttons?

You just want a cheap ride home regardless.

pendragon_arther

BykerSands wrote: »

Maybe a better upbringing would have got you some manors and a better education would have seen you in a job able to support your family with one job.

But do keep up the insults as your post contain more to them then evidence to back up your poor arguements.

It starts out as hate and then ends up as.... love.

PCMcGarry wrote: »

It will be hard for someone to prove you wrong when you've yet to prove yourself right.

You just post any old !!!!! and slag off anyone who dares question you.

Just because you keep spouting your crap it doesn't make it right. Post some facts if you want to stop being considered a laughing stock.

This smacks of multipleusernamers...

dacouch

slink85 wrote: »

never going to happen in our lifetime, driverless cars without a 'real' driver is a thing of fantasy.

Holy thread resurrection.

http://www.bitterwallet.com/motoring/google-ford-uber-the-coalition-of-self-driving-cars