Free the 4000

beamerguy

4consumerrights wrote: »

Yes my signature reveals I am involved in an 'APPEALS SERVICE' so again why would I be a whistleblower ?

Unfortunately, I don't take orders from you nor am I answerable to you :-)

So that's a no then

"I have sufficient evidence that appeals were not considered on every aspect"

SO, WILL YOU TELL THE PEOPLE ABOUT THIS ??

pappa_golf

beamerguy wrote: »

So that's a no then

"I have sufficient evidence that appeals were not considered on every aspect"

SO, WILL YOU TELL THE PEOPLE ABOUT THIS ??

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=69795647&postcount=73




The Lead Adjudicator has already granted a similar application in a small number of cases. Your appeal was not due for determination when the application was made and has not yet been considered in any way. Your case will be adjourned for 28 days.

beamerguy

pappa_golf wrote: »

http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=69795647&postcount=73




The Lead Adjudicator has already granted a similar application in a small number of cases. Your appeal was not due for determination when the application was made and has not yet been considered in any way. Your case will be adjourned for 28 days.

that has already been seen

bod1467

So who are "the people" that 4CR should be telling?

Appeals Service = Company who fights against PPCs helping motorists appeal PCNs.

beamerguy

bod1467 wrote: »

So who are "the people" that 4CR should be telling?

Appeals Service = Company who fights against PPCs helping motorists appeal PCNs.

"I have sufficient evidence that appeals were not considered on every aspect"

so with such a statement folks deserve an explanation

This gets even more confusing
"Appeals Service = Company who fights against PPCs helping motorists appeal PCNs"

Who is that ?

4consumerrights

beamerguy wrote: »

n

This gets even more confusing
"Appeals Service = Company who fights against PPCs helping motorists appeal PCNs"

Who is that ?

Why is that confusing?

....... just shows your lack of research in the forum and private parking matters.

Oh dearie me - just twigged - you didn't think I worked for POPLA did you???!!!!

4consumerrights

beamerguy wrote: »

"I have sufficient evidence that appeals were not considered on every aspect"

so with such a statement folks deserve an explanation

As I said I don't owe you any explanation or justification of any postings as clearly you have a lot to learn...

Coupon-mad

Let's have this back on topic and stop the bickering as per usual.

beamerguy

Coupon-mad wrote: »

Let's have this back on topic and stop the bickering as per usual.

Totally agree, I'm lost, most people will be, end of story

Redx

clue

PPAL aka , check the BMPA parking cowboys site

companies tend not to give out privileged information, so neither should she , so no she does not owe you , me or us any explanation

deffo not popla , not the IAS , not any PPC either , plus there is only one legitimate private appeals service