We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Help! Ukpc have 'photographic evidence' which isn't real
Options
Comments
-
This has already been done (undercover reporting - at UKPC).0
-
This has already been done (undercover reporting - at UKPC).
It was PCM UK, bod.
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/05/is-it-pcm-uk-who-make-up-stuff-all-time.html
http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2015/07/pcm-uk-case-stayed-until-beavis.htmlPlease note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
I knew it had UK in the name.
But hasn't there also already been a UKPC one as well? (I know they featured on the Sheriffs programme for owing wages to an ex-employee).0 -
Ha ha! That was UKCPS!
Another UK in the name though!!Je Suis Cecil.0 -
Today's Sunday Times has a feature about UKPC's DVLA suspension , but then spoils it all when it talks about "thousands of car parks descending into a free-for -all".
On a similar note, I thought that the results of BPA Ltd's investigation was supposed to to announced last week. What's happened to that?What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0 -
Can't upset ukpc, the bpa owe too much money to London Councils. I wonder how many/how much the ppc's owe the bpa?I'd rather be an Optimist and be proved wrong than a Pessimist and be proved right.0
-
That article might just be a BPA plant.trisontana wrote: »Today's Sunday Times has a feature about UKPC's DVLA suspension , but then spoils it all when it talks about "thousands of car parks descending into a free-for -all".
On a similar note, I thought that the results of BPA Ltd's investigation was supposed to to announced last week. What's happened to that? My very sincere apologies for those hoping to request off-board assistance but I am now so inundated with requests that in order to do justice to those "already in the system" I am no longer accepting PM's and am unlikely to do so for the foreseeable future (August 2016).
For those seeking more detailed advice and guidance regarding small claims cases arising from private parking issues I recommend that you visit the Private Parking forum on PePiPoo.com0 -
Parking operator sanctioned after fraudulent tickets issued at Lincoln car park:-
http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2015/09/parking-operator-sanctioned-after-fraudulent-tickets-issued-at-lincoln-car-park/
It will be interesting to see what this sanction entails. Nice to see that the BPA cop will ban financial incentives for PPC staff.What part of "A whop bop-a-lu a whop bam boo" don't you understand?0 -
Interesting reference to a minimum 10 minute grace period; although I'd suggest that it will also be the maximum as well!trisontana wrote: »Parking operator sanctioned after fraudulent tickets issued at Lincoln car park:-
http://thelincolnite.co.uk/2015/09/parking-operator-sanctioned-after-fraudulent-tickets-issued-at-lincoln-car-park/
It will be interesting to see what this sanction entails. Nice to see that the BPA cop will ban financial incentives for PPC staff.0 -
Since then, the BPA has concluded an investigation into the allegations made against UKPC, and has disciplined the company in accordance with its Scheme of Sanctions.
The BPA did not disclose the exact sanctions applied but said that its investigations “highlighted the need to update our Code of Practice, to make it absolutely clear that the practice of offering financial incentives to parking attendants/wardens which relate to the quantity of penalty charge notices issued by them is wholly unacceptable.”
Well, that's all ok then! So it obviously now takes more than fraud to get expelled from the BPA?
You know what, I'm actually feeling a tinge of sympathy for owd Trev, who was kicked out primarily for being a bungling clown, but well short of being a fraudster!
Presumably it's also now business as usual with our friends in Swansea?
All a bit of a whitehouse (oops, whitewash!).Please note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.7K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards