We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Corbynomics: A Dystopia
Comments
-
Labour leadership: quarter of new supporters could be barred from voting
Jeremy Corbyn’s allies say party’s oversight process could lead to contest being skewedMore than a quarter of people who have signed up as registered Labour supporters in the run-up to the party’s leadership election could be barred from taking part, something some supporters of Jeremy Corbyn are worried could skew the vote.
Under revised rules for the contest between Corbyn and Owen Smith, introduced by Labour’s national executive committee last month, full members cannot vote unless they joined in January or before.
However, the party allowed newly registered supporters, a lesser category of affiliation, to sign up and vote for a £25 fee; 183,000 did so.
According to the Huffington Post, 40,000 of these have been excluded for reasons such as supporting a rival party, not being on the electoral register or problems with the payment. Another 10,000 cases are to go before the NEC’s oversight panel to decide whether they can vote. Allies of Corbyn say they have been told similar figures, and are concerned that the process could lead to some of his backers being weeded out.
http://www.theguardian.com/politics/2016/aug/02/labour-leadership-jeremy-corbyn-quarter-supporters-barred-voting0 -
The Penny (Finally) DropsOwen Jones Issues ‘Wake-Up Call’ To Jeremy Corbyn Fans After Reaction To Blog On Despair At Labour Party“If Labour loses an election badly - as it is currently on course to do - then a) Jeremy Corbyn will resign (as John McDonnell has already said), b) the left will be blamed and associated with calamitous defeat all over again and c) the party will shift dramatically to the right,” Jones wrote on Tuesday.
http://www.huffingtonpost.co.uk/entry/owen-jones-blog-jeremy-corbyn-labour-party-facebook_uk_57a09033e4b07cb01dd08bd00 -
Shifting to the right is the only way to win. The UK has never elected and will never elect a loony left government.0
-
TrickyTree83 wrote: »They don't care.
Their way or the highway. They couldn't possibly be getting it wrong.
I think that's why the likes of Toasty are so angry - they know they are getting it wrong but they are going to do it anyway......
and Toasty 12,000 people in a city of half a million isn't very many....especially as we would vote for a pig in lipstick if it had a Labour rosette on it....A journey of a thousand miles begins with a single step
Savings For Kids 1st Jan 2019 £16,112
0 -
You know that schism that the left have been saying won't happen?
"Anti-Corbyn MPs planning split 'will sue Labour so they can use its name'"
http://www.independent.co.uk/news/uk/politics/jeremy-corbyn-labour-split-sue-court-challenge-name-leadership-election-moderates-blairites-a7163716.htmlI am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
BACKFRMTHEEDGE wrote: »I think that's why the likes of Toasty are so angry - they know they are getting it wrong but they are going to do it anyway......
and Toasty 12,000 people in a city of half a million isn't very many....especially as we would vote for a pig in lipstick if it had a Labour rosette on it....
We can be sure that none of those 12,000 took time off work. The Corbyn-supporting classes think work is for mugs.0 -
westernpromise wrote: »We can be sure that none of those 12,000 took time off work.
They'll all be full time Union Reps......... Ours does no real work as far as we can ascertain. Why the taxpayer has to fund such people is beyond me.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Why the taxpayer has to fund such people is beyond me.
They do? Surely every penny should come from union types?I am not a financial adviser and neither do I play one on television. I might occasionally give bad advice but at least it's free.
Like all religions, the Faith of the Invisible Pink Unicorns is based upon both logic and faith. We have faith that they are pink; we logically know that they are invisible because we can't see them.0 -
gadgetmind wrote: »They do? Surely every penny should come from union types?
No, they get a sub from the taxpayer - a disgrace which should end.0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »Who wouldn't take industrial action to protect their own rights?
Surpriningly quite a few. The fact you ask suggests you have never been involved in industrial action.Socialism includes social responsibility, which means protecting other people's rights.
Agreed but you do this by having the power to change laws not by jumping up and down and shouting.I am wholly unmoved by the whining of 170 career politicians in the PLP concerning the plight of themselves, I am quite encouraged by Corbin's commitment to social responsibility.
If it were 170 career politicians worrid about their own future I would agree. But most of them have professional qualifications and experience that will see them walk into jobs after the next election if they lose. The people you claim to represent do not have this luxury.
Many of these 170 have strong social consciences and chose politics to improve the lot of ordinary people. What's more is they have actually got elected and in doing so won the confidence of voters on the left and in the centre.Off to the Brighton rally tomorrow. I'm sure no one else will go because he's so unpopular and all. Unless any of the 12,000 people who were at Liverpool today decide they want an encore.
Ah so you just go to rallies rather than do useful work.:)
But the point is these rallies do not get people elected to power.You might be able to read about it on social media because there is not a snowball's chance in hell the mainstream press will report it.
What is so newsworthy about such a gathering? OK Corbyn has a million supporters and some turn up at rallies in which he preaches to the converted. But how does that win over floating voters or those on the centre-right of the party?Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.7K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 258.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards