PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

To Landlords, would you Rent to a Pet owner?

Options
1356710

Comments

  • HappyMJ
    HappyMJ Posts: 21,115 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    jjlandlord wrote: »
    No, it is costing the tenant's money as the legal costs will be awarded to the landlord.
    The tenant will get a CCJ if he does not pay within 30 days.

    Let's get the facts straight, shall we?
    Okay the tenant gets a CCJ for a successful Section 8 notice which the court is very unlikely to grant during a fixed term...the tenant doesn't own a property and has no money as tenant has much more pressing bills to pay. Tenant can't be traced. Landlord has lost the money even in the short term if eventually tenant can pay the landlord is out of pocket and is taking a huge risk.

    Section 21 costs are not passed on to tenant so no problem there.
    :footie:
    :p Regular savers earn 6% interest (HSBC, First Direct, M&S) :p Loans cost 2.9% per year (Nationwide) = FREE money. :p
  • jjlandlord
    jjlandlord Posts: 5,099 Forumite
    HappyMJ wrote: »
    Section 21 costs are not passed on to tenant so no problem there.

    That is not true.

    £280 court cost + legal costs (capped just below £100 iirc for the accelerated procedure) + £110 bailiffs fee if tenant does not comply with court order = £490.

    CCJ if not paid.


    The more we read your post the more you seem a tenant from hell.
    And you say that you are also a landlord?! So you manage to score on both sides!
  • ognum
    ognum Posts: 4,879 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    I am happy for my tenants in my houses to have pets, I have one family who have a cat and a dog, interestingly they let their own home which was advertised as no pets!

    My flats have no pet clause in the leases so I stand by that.
  • *Robin*
    *Robin* Posts: 3,364 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker Stoptober Survivor
    Try Gumtree, private ads in local papers, card in post office etc., - avoid agencies altogether!

    As a small LL, also a pet owner who has been in your position OP, I actively sought a tenant with pets for a long-term tenancy (I self-manage, as do many LLs with only one or two properties).

    All the applicants' pets were included in interview, and I asked for a larger deposit in case of damage. Then picked the family who were clearly the most responsible pet-owners.

    Three years down the line everyone is happy; those particular tenants are likely to stay for another decade (they've got children as well now, so the excellent school up the road is an added incentive).

    However, if one of my tenants was untruthful about having pets, they'd definitely receive an S21 when their initial AST was coming to an end because it's a betrayal of trust - what else have they lied about?
  • Pixie5740
    Pixie5740 Posts: 14,515 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Eighth Anniversary Name Dropper Photogenic
    I'd try what *Robin* suggests and maybe posting your own advert on Gumtree too.

    What about putting together a CV for your cats. You could document the vaccinations they've had, any flea prevention treatment and the name of the vet they are registered with.

    Are you renting somewhere else just now? If so would your current landlord be willing to included details about the pets (well trained, didn't pee instead or scratch the furniture, that sort of thing) in your reference?
  • CathA
    CathA Posts: 1,207 Forumite
    Seventh Anniversary 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    My daughter has dogs and when she went to see her flat, she waited until she'd met the landlord, they'd got on well and had a chat and then mentioned that she had dogs, would that be an issue? She had references from her previous landlord for the dogs, offered to pay any extra deposit and also for any damage.

    A lot of landlords put no pets but if they meet you and you are a reasonable person with good references and offer money upfront, they might be inclined to change their mind. Worth a shot? Good luck anyway.
  • BitterAndTwisted
    BitterAndTwisted Posts: 22,492 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Agencies will stand by the "no pets" rule as most of time they can't be bothered to contact the landlord, and a lot of the time they don't need to, such is the competition.

    Find a property that's managed by the LL rather than an agency, and once you've met them, invite them to visit you in your current property. Emphasise that you're looking for a long-term let. What they're mostly worried about is damage and fleas. Also later tenants having an allergy but there's not much you can do about that. A responsible, solvent, pet-owning tenant who's looking at the long-term is the ideal kind for most (sensible) landlords. Professional ones. Accidental amateur landlords, not so much
  • MARTYM8`
    MARTYM8` Posts: 1,212 Forumite
    Eighth Anniversary 1,000 Posts
    The trouble with not being totally honest is, what if the neighbours know or are still in contact with the landlord/owner?

    You might get away with cats - but dogs will tend to bark and potentially annoy the neighbours if they do it regularly or at night.

    A dog owner has moved into the house behind my parents - the dog barks all the time. Doesn't bother my parents - as they are both going a bit deaf - but it would irritate the hell out of me if I lived there.
  • I'm not a landlord, but I'd be far more weary of an owner with a dog than a cat. But then again, the type of people who will let their dog poo all over the place I think are the types of person who will say they don't have a dog.
  • solentsusie
    solentsusie Posts: 578 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 500 Posts Combo Breaker
    I have a cat and I had no trouble renting a property. I also have had friends who have rented with dogs and cats and not had issues. I am sure the right property will come along soon, especially if you have a year of rent in your back pocket.


    I think being honest is essential, if you are caught out why would the landlord extend your lease? You have just proved yourself to be dishonest.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.