We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Range Rover Evoque - garage has had it 4 weeks due to fault
Options
Comments
-
Not sure if you would really be 'reasonably' entitled to this - especially since your point all along has been 'this is taking too long', and now you'll potentially cause a delay yourself by taking the newer model.
If you can get ANY brand new one (or anything with lower mileage and at least as good spec as yours) you should bite their arms off!
The dealer said the fix to my car would potentially take longer than waiting for a new one off the production line so no way am I causing the delay!
I have made it very clear its brand new or a refund I am not accepting a second hand car. I apologies if that sounds harsh and unreasonable but we have been through a lot of hassle which Land Rover and the dealer has acknowledged and accept and in their words they want to do the right thing for us and put this right. I am hoping if a brand new car wasn't an option the dealership wouldn't have offered this in the first place when I asked for my money back.0 -
-
-
Would you accept a brand new current model?0
-
It is reasonably common for JLR to offer replacement cars for troublesome ones based on a sample of my Land Rover owning friends.0
-
Spanish_Escape wrote: »Not sure if you would really be 'reasonably' entitled to this - especially since your point all along has been 'this is taking too long', and now you'll potentially cause a delay yourself by taking the newer model.
If you can get ANY brand new one (or anything with lower mileage and at least as good spec as yours) you should bite their arms off!
The dealer said the fix to my car would potentially take longer than waiting for a new one off the production line so no way am I causing the delay!
I have made it very clear its brand new or a refund I am not accepting a second hand car. I apologies if that sounds harsh and unreasonable but we have been through a lot of hassle which Land Rover and the dealer has acknowledged and accept and in their words they want to do the right thing for us and put this right. I am hoping if a brand new car wasn't an option the dealership wouldn't have offered this in the first place when I asked for my money back.
Also, it's all well and good throwing round the SOGA etc but please bear in mind you have had over 12 months use out of your car so you wouldn't really be legally entitled to a full refund or a new vehicle. The dealership seem to be acting quite reasonable imho.0 -
When I was discussing the options with the manager I never thought about the new model to be honest it was him who indicated that it would the new model he would look to offer me. Who wouldn't accept the new model if its on offer?? Ok I may need to wait another 7 weeks but I am going to have to wait even longer for my old car to be fixed. I totally agree the dealerships are being very reasonable and the manager was very genuine and nice.
Neilmlc - IMO I think I have every right to throw around any law/rule when I have paid 10's of 000 of £'s , which I saved really hard for, for something that is faulty after 12 months of careful use and up to now waiting patiently for my car to be fixed to no avail. I suspect many more people would have lost patients long ago and have even higher demands then me. I would be interested to learn what you would do differently and what you would accept as a satisfactory solution if you were in my position?0 -
Spanish_Escape wrote: »Neilmlc - IMO I think I have every right to throw around any law/rule when I have paid 10's of 000 of £'s , which I saved really hard for, for something that is faulty after 12 months of careful use and up to now waiting patiently for my car to be fixed to no avail. I suspect many more people would have lost patients long ago and have even higher demands then me. I would be interested to learn what you would do differently and what you would accept as a satisfactory solution if you were in my position?
You ask me what would be satisfactory, a car of the same spec, age, condition and mileage would be sufficient and maybe something to compensate for your trouble.0 -
Spanish_Escape wrote: »Neilmlc - IMO I think I have every right to throw around any law/rule when I have paid 10's of 000 of £'s , which I saved really hard for, for something that is faulty after 12 months of careful use and up to now waiting patiently for my car to be fixed to no avail. I suspect many more people would have lost patients long ago and have even higher demands then me. I would be interested to learn what you would do differently and what you would accept as a satisfactory solution if you were in my position?
I don't see why a straight exchange for a different 12mo/12k mile vehicle would be unreasonable, tbh. An exchange for a new vehicle is a substantial goodwill gesture on top. Compare the retail prices of an approved-used 12mo/12k mile vehicle and a similar new one to get an indication of how substantial that goodwill gesture is.0 -
DPFs,modern diesels,BMW,Landrover,new modern cars,,pah,,who'd av' 'em..more trouble than they are worth..
My sympathies to the OP..Im sure it will eventually be sorted and you and hubby will be pootling along happy again..Feudal Britain needs land reform. 70% of the land is "owned" by 1 % of the population and at least 50% is unregistered (inherited by landed gentry). Thats why your slave box costs so much..0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards