ANPR Ltd - Local counsil statement,, !!!!!!!

Unicorn51

My first post.

Council sign reads:

ANPR Ltd of Preston is contracted to prevent (stop) vehicles parking in excess of 2 hours.

If a motorist exceeds 2 hours are ANPR in breach of contract.

The_Slithy_Tove

Unicorn51 wrote: »

Council sign reads:

ANPR Ltd of Preston is contracted to prevent (stop) vehicles parking in excess of 2 hours.

If a motorist exceeds 2 hours are ANPR in breach of contract.

Curiously enough, that is precisely the premise Trev tries to use in some car parks. He claims that he must pay the landowner £100 or whatever because of that breach of his contract, and therefore this amounts to a loss to him, which he attempts to get the driver or keeper to pay. A novel approach to GPEOL, scuppered somewhat by the fact that no such contract to pay the landowner £100 has ever been proven to exist, or such a payment to the landowner ever made.

waamo

ANPR Ltd have signs that essentially are gibberish on top of lies. They claim they have to pay £100 to the council for every breach and that they are claiming that loss back from you.

This is patently idiotic and what's more the council admit they don't receive a penny from Trev.

I've heard he has finally launched a genuine court claim. If he's claiming trespass he could be in bother as he isn't a landowner or a solicitor. If hes claiming contract well based on that signage he hasn't a hope.

enfield_freddy

there was a reply on what do they know that stated that preston counsil had never received any money from them , after being asked this very question


however , it seems to be missing


what do they know / preston counsil / ANPR ltd , 3 un resolved and non answered questions , one going back over 2 yrs , no answer F all

enfield_freddy

waamo wrote: »

ANPR Ltd have signs that essentially are gibberish on top of lies. They claim they have to pay £100 to the council for every breach and that they are claiming that loss back from you.

This is patently idiotic and what's more the council admit they don't receive a penny from Trev.

I've heard he has finally launched a genuine court claim. If he's claiming trespass he could be in bother as he isn't a landowner or a solicitor. If hes claiming contract well based on that signage he hasn't a hope.

yup paper on pepipoo , bet he backs down , or N Martin shows up , and says "I know this court personally"

enfield_freddy

and a reply from the BPA!!!!


Thanks for your email and for outlining your concerns about ANPR Ltd.





I have written to the DVLA this afternoon to seek their position on the issue that you have raised with me and I will revert once this has been received.





ANPR Ltd were informed of the termination of their membership on 8th April 2015 and we issued a Press Release on 13th April which contained the following;





The British Parking Association (BPA) has terminated the membership of ANPR Limited with immediate effect.





Following investigations arising from complaints by motorists, BPA Officers awarded 16 Sanction Points covering multiple Code of Practice breaches including failing to follow agreed procedures in handling motorist appeals and failing to live up to BPA customer service requirements.





I am not in a position to provide any further details than the above. I note your contention about FOI but as the BPA is not a statutory body, we are not required to comply with FOI requests.





While I can't speak for the CSA, the two sentences in bold above would be enough for me to carefully review an application to join the BPA if they were written by another ATA about the applicant.





Please appreciate that I am not seeking to adopt an adversarial position here and you can rest assured that I am as interested in hearing, what the DVLA's position on this matter is, as you are.





Kind regards





Steve Clark


Head of Operational Services


British Parking Association


Tel: 01444 447 307


Email: [EMAIL="steve.c@britishparking.co.uk"]steve.c@britishparking.co.uk[/EMAIL]


Web: www.britishparking.co.uk

waamo

I would imagine the BPA would be livid if Trev found a back door route to the DVLA database.

The BPA are losing enough members as it is and with various companies finding they do not need to be in an ATA it can only make other members wonder what they are paying their fees for.

enfield_freddy

yes , they are livid! nice bold statements to be forwarded to the CSA , they must have a probation time?




members quit and use the credit way , if anyone can stop this its not us , its the BPA , hence my email


let them do the work


BPA +IPC , better the devil you know!

The_Slithy_Tove

waamo wrote: »

I would imagine the BPA would be livid if Trev found a back door route to the DVLA database.

The BPA are losing enough members as it is and with various companies finding they do not need to be in an ATA it can only make other members wonder what they are paying their fees for.

I think this sentence from the BPA

you can rest assured that I am as interested in hearing, what the DVLA's position on this matter is, as you are

from the Pepipoo thread http://forums.pepipoo.com/index.php?s=&showtopic=99029&view=findpost&p=1077943 says exactly that.

enfield_freddy

yup , and recently updated


yes! and if anyone can challenge the DVLA , its the BPA , hence my email to inform him!


better the devils we know than ticket+DCA+CC papers with no appeal system


edit: the official statement from the DVLA is

DVLA do not release data to ANPR Limited for trespass and CSA is not recognised as a relevant ATA for the purposes of releasing data for parking / trespass purposes.


Kind regards


Liz

Elizabeth Symons

BUT is this statement for the general public or the truth

looking on prankster website (ace) , yup they gave info , then said "sorry"

the full un edited email from the DVLA was forwarded to the BPA , they have a direct contact number? and a statement