📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Speeding Summons?

1212223242527»

Comments

  • Happychappy
    Happychappy Posts: 2,937 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    edited 3 August 2015 at 6:21PM
    ChumLee wrote: »
    It should do if that's what the witness said.

    The statement has nothing to do with what the witness said, it is what the witness saw other people doing or what the witness says he/she heard, if he/she heard someone say "I'm going to murder" etc, then that is part of the witnesses evidence, don't quite understand what this has to do with a possible attempt to pervert the course of justice or a simple failure to supply information under S172.
  • ChumLee
    ChumLee Posts: 749 Forumite
    The statement has nothing to do with what the witness said, it is what the witness saw other people doing or what the witness says he/she heard, if he/she heard someone say "I'm going to murder" etc, then that is part of the witnesses evidence, don't quite understand what this has to do with a possible attempt to pervert the course of justice or a simple failure to supply information under S172.

    It has everything to do with taking a statement. If those are the words the witness used to explain what they are telling you then that's how they should be written.
  • Well, it looks as if I might be in the clear.

    Even given the 6 month time limit it will be time expired now. According to my legal advice, I can consider it closed unless they have had the hearing in my absence (the summoons got lost in the post etc.).
  • Car_54
    Car_54 Posts: 8,873 Forumite
    Tenth Anniversary 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    When was the alleged offence?

    They have six months to bring the case to court, plus possibly a month to issue a summons. Your first post was on 16th May.
  • Johnmcl7
    Johnmcl7 Posts: 2,840 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Dr._Shoe wrote: »
    Well, it looks as if I might be in the clear.

    Even given the 6 month time limit it will be time expired now. According to my legal advice, I can consider it closed unless they have had the hearing in my absence (the summoons got lost in the post etc.).

    You need to get better legal advice as it's incorrect, they have six months from the offence to lay the information with the court but there's no set limit for summons after that (aside from not taking an unreasonable mount of time). One to two months is not unusual for the summons plus for a S172 offence they have an additional month as that offence occurs a month after the initial offence.

    John
  • Happychappy
    Happychappy Posts: 2,937 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Weren't you always in the clear ?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.