We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Leaving school - is this true?
Comments
-
We would risk returning to the secondary school versus grammar school "stigma" that existed when I was at school in the 1960s/70s so they would have to be structured as parallel education streams, not hierarchical, leading to distinct but equally valid qualifications and further educational/career opportunities.
How can't see how this would every happen. In the end, academic skills will always be more valued than vocational ones in many fields, if only because academic skills will always be more transferable across different career paths than vocational ones.
I do think that the system already allows a very high level of flexibility in that regards in this country, much more than other european ones. I also think that there is a danger in children being labelled as non academic and pushed towards the vocational path when their reason for struggling might be very different and in the right circumstances would do very well in Uni. As a matter of fact, I know quite a few people who just about made it to A levels, but then excel at Uni, going all the way to Masters and more.0 -
Unfortunately, in some areas that is the reality of the bulk of the available jobs. There will always be Elderly people in every town, but the same can't be said for large manufacturers and the various smaller material industries and service providers which are often set up to serve them, so where are all of these 'other' jobs you speak of?I'm not disagreeing with the general focus of the posts. But a couple of people have said 'there's always jobs in care', and that attitude really annoys me. Do we really want people working as carers who are only there because there's no other jobs?
*When* there is a Car Manufacturer, Ship Builder, Clothing Manufacturer, Dyson, Samsung, Apple, White Goods & Chocolate factory located in every UK County it will be different, but until that time most of the old mills once employing hundreds of people in a lot of the aforementioned industries have long since closed or have been converted into trendy flats, often taking with them the chance of any work outside of the care industry."Dont expect anybody else to support you, maybe you have a trust fund, maybe you have a wealthy spouse, but you never know when each one, might run out" - Mary Schmich0 -
Even if people "have to" work as carers because there are no other jobs, they should work to the best of their ability and respect their patients. Not liking a job is no excuse for not doing it properly. People need to develop some self discipline.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 353.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.1K Spending & Discounts
- 246.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.2K Life & Family
- 260.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards