universal credit sanctions.

lovinituk

mattcanary wrote: »

Grow up. Answer the pointas requested, butt out or admit you are wrong

Wow, you really are like a dog with a bone on this one!! I've made my points already, not my fault if you don't like them!

PS I'm definitely not wrong

mattcanary

I have told you how I have interpreted your posts.
It is a quite natural way to interpret what you have said. Particularly when taken in the context of Mac's previous post.

I have suggetsed your earlier post was wrong. You said that I have misinterpreted it without giving any indication as to why I have misinterpreted it. I mean seriously - come on....

lovinituk

I don't know what else you want me to think say! I mean this is a fun way to pass the time and it could go on for ever but I suspect that everyone else is getting rather p*ssed with us.

I've made my points, that are correct of course, and you have decided I meant something else which you don't agree with. We've gone round in circles a couple of times and nothing has changed so where do we go from here cupcake?!

mattcanary

lovinituk wrote: »

I don't know what else you want me to think say! I mean this is a fun way to pass the time and it could go on for ever but I suspect that everyone else is getting rather p*ssed with us.

I've made my points, that are correct of course, and you have decided I meant something else which you don't agree with. We've gone round in circles a couple of times and nothing has changed so where do we go from here cupcake?!

You are seriously patronising, aren't you?

lovinituk

mattcanary wrote: »

You are seriously patronising, aren't you?

I don't know. Am I, or is that just what you think I am regardless of the facts?

mattcanary

lovinituk wrote: »

I don't know. Am I, or is that just what you think I am regardless of the facts?

Cupcake??!!!

You stated that people shouldn;t get benefits for living a cushy lifestyle in reponse to Mac's post about people happily doing a job they can handle (that may be on low pay or limited hours - although mac didn;t specifically state this would be the case).
I replied in response to your post - that I feel you misinterpreted (probably deliberately) in the first place.

lovinituk

Hahaha! This thread has turned in to the Matt and Lovinit Show (although I think the 'Lovinit and Cupcake Show' has legs too)!! I'm so sorry everyone else reading by this! Perhaps it should be moved to the Discussion Time section!

lovinituk

mattcanary wrote: »

Cupcake??!!!

You stated that people shouldn;t get benefits for living a cushy lifestyle in reponse to Mac's post about people happily doing a job they can handle (that may be on low pay or limited hours - although mac didn;t specifically state this would be the case).
I replied in response to your post - that I feel you misinterpreted (probably deliberately) in the first place.

Thanks! I'd completely forgotten what we had covered just minutes ago!

Nope, still doesn't change my view. Sorry!

mattcanary

lovinituk wrote: »

Thanks! I'd completely forgotten what we had covered just minutes ago!

Nope, still doesn't change my view. Sorry!

What's the point.

You are displaying your ignorance by refusing to answer my points. Now who's the politician?

Stop being so passve and nail your flag to the mast.

Otherwise as you say, we are going around in circles

lovinituk

mattcanary wrote: »

What's the point.

You are displaying your ignorance by refusing to answer my points. Now who's the politician?

Stop being so passve and nail your flag to the mast.

Otherwise as you say, we are going around in circles

Do you want me to admit I'm wrong?