We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide

Long haul sardining

135

Comments

  • EssexExile
    EssexExile Posts: 6,598 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    Agreed. I can't do much about being 6' 3" & I've tried over the last 35 years but I can't do much about the bad back. If my back is having a bad spell I couldn't get into the seats at the back of the plane, if it's having a good spell I could get in but probably not out again.
    Tall, dark & handsome. Well two out of three ain't bad.
  • Blue264
    Blue264 Posts: 1,570 Forumite
    torbrex wrote: »
    I have found that it is not so much the width of the seat as whether or not the person in front of you drops their seat back :(
    ...and just as you've been served coffee :mad:

    That's the moment I (sneakily) use the velcro on the on their head rest cover to fasten their hair to the seat. Sure makes them yelp as they get up from their seat :D
  • richardw
    richardw Posts: 19,470 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    edited 3 September 2016 at 9:05PM
    AA has gone 3-4-3 on some B777 aircraft, Etihad as well.
    There are more B787 Dreamliners in service and in January BA will operate their longest sardine flight LHR-SCL with a B789.
    For short haul there's the 230 seat A321 operated by Frontier, Iberia Express, VietJet, Vueling and Wizzair. Monarch's A321 has 214 seats.
    Posts are not advice and must not be relied upon.
  • richardw
    richardw Posts: 19,470 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    BA join the fun from 2018 on their long haul Gatwick based B772s http://www.thebasource.com/british-airways-announces-gatwick-3-class-b777-200er-densification/
    Posts are not advice and must not be relied upon.
  • bagand96 wrote: »
    Who's using 3-5-3 in the A380?

    I've never flown in a 3-4-3 777 before. But Emirates use it, as do Etihad and they are both airlines that seem to regularly get praised for their service. BA use 3-3-3 and generally people seem to think BA are average. So on the face of it, there's far more to it than seat width and other aspects of the flight seem to leave a longer impact on pax.

    That said, Air France are a terrible airline regardless of seating layout.

    BA are going to 10 across on the 777s.
  • richardw wrote: »
    Monarch is the narrowest I can find at 16.25" wide http://www.seatguru.com/airlines/Monarch_Airlines/Monarch_Airlines_Airbus_A330-200.php

    which is 1.75" less than the Airbus 18" economy standard width.

    Seatguru have Monarch as 17.8"/18" which is about right. They're far from 16.25". They only aircraft they ever had with seats that narrow was the A300, but it was fun lol.
  • Pollycat
    Pollycat Posts: 36,226 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Savvy Shopper!
    Seatguru have Monarch as 17.8"/18" which is about right. They're far from 16.25". They only aircraft they ever had with seats that narrow was the A300, but it was fun lol.

    But Richardw's post was made 2 years ago. :)
  • *j*
    *j* Posts: 327 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 100 Posts
    richardw wrote: »
    BA join the fun from 2018 on their long haul Gatwick based B772s http://www.thebasource.com/british-airways-announces-gatwick-3-class-b777-200er-densification/

    I love the 52 more pax, so we'll have 3 fewer toilets combination.

    I suppose BA reckon that by feeding their guests less, there will be not so much need for the toilets.

    The changes will enable them to fly more people from Gatwick to Orlando at a smaller cost than would otherwise be the case. Sounds like a win-win to me.
  • Pollycat wrote: »
    But Richardw's post was made 2 years ago. :)

    Oops my bad. Hadn't noticed it was an old thread that had been resurrected several times :eek:
  • Bogalot
    Bogalot Posts: 1,102 Forumite
    Pollycat wrote: »
    But Richardw's post was made 2 years ago. :)

    It is richardw that keeps (quite bizarrely) resurrecting it ;)
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 354.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 254.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 455.4K Spending & Discounts
  • 247.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 604.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 178.4K Life & Family
  • 261.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.