Fuming over accident

DevCoder

And, unless Ive misread, we don't know if the accident went in the accident book or not do we? Only confirmation with the site management would be able to confirm that which I haven't seen that the OP has confirmed.

wiogs

hollydays wrote: »

Recordings of her child if you mean another person?

No. That is not what I mean.

hollydays

wiogs wrote: »

Ooh sounds painful.

Still, what is this "right" you speak of?

Subject data access request

hollydays

krisdorey wrote: »

And, unless Ive misread, we don't know if the accident went in the accident book or not do we? Only confirmation with the site management would be able to confirm that which I haven't seen that the OP has confirmed.

Erm.. I expect the name and the address of the op are supposed to be part of the report..

DevCoder

hollydays wrote: »

Subject data access request

For which the CCTV laws are quite clear, the data handler can refuse you footage if third parties are present.

The OP wanted footage to see if the person who was dripping water over the affected area had been there for some time. Such footage can rightfully be refused.

A DSAR will not overrule this.

wiogs

hollydays wrote: »

Subject data access request

A private individual has no "right" to request CCTV footage of a third party.

Why do you think that such a thing exists?

hollydays

krisdorey wrote: »

Quit before you embarrass yourself further.

The DPA and CCTv laws are quite clear, they can refuse you CCTV footage if it shows a third party. If the OP wishes to raise the complaint with the police then the police can see the full footage. The OP cannot force them to display third party cctv footage and certainly not force them the cost of pixelating any third parties...

No you are wrong. For the cost of £ 10 the op could make a data access request. The police have nothing to do with it.
Who's talking third party.you?
Anyway it's the hse -edit health and safety executive -who could request it but quite honestly it's not relevant

wiogs

hollydays wrote: »

No you are wrong. For the cost of £ 10 the op could make a data access request. The police have nothing to do with it.
Who's talking third party.you?

You should indeed follow the advice and quit while you are behind.

wiogs

What is "hsa"

DevCoder

hollydays wrote: »

Erm.. I expect the name and the address of the op are supposed to be part of the report..

Umm no, there actually is no need for the full name and address of accidents to be logged in the sites accident book unless they are reportable under RIDDOR. As the accident did not involve an employee , and it was "minor" then it does not fall under RIDDOR to my knowledge.