Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Economists Urge Scotland to Vote No......

1303133353664

Comments

  • CLAPTON
    CLAPTON Posts: 41,865 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Conrad wrote: »
    Fear won the day just as it will in the EU referendum. Anyone would think all those prosperous independent nations were hell holes withering on the vine.


    Bovine group think takes over.


    In time localism and independence will once again become valued concepts, for the time being the sheeple aren't ready.



    do you actually live in Scotland and so were willing to live with a reduced standard of living, simply to sate your wish for the Scottish people to be separate from the English; or is it 'do as I say and not as I do'?
  • danothy wrote: »
    I think it's rude to the Scottish people to suggest that they were scared into voting no.

    If you think that's rude then you haven't been reading the other posts on this debate :eek:
  • danothy
    danothy Posts: 2,200 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture Combo Breaker
    hugoshavez wrote: »
    If you think that's rude then you haven't been reading the other posts on this debate :eek:

    That conclusion does not follow from the premise you present to support it. It implies that relativism overrides absolutes - i.e. that because other things may be said to be ruder, that this is therefore not rude - and that by stating that this is rude to Scottish people I must therefore not have been exposed to the greater rudeness. Neither of these things are true.
    If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.
  • danothy wrote: »
    That conclusion does not follow from the premise you present to support it. It implies that relativism overrides absolutes - i.e. that because other things may be said to be ruder, that this is therefore not rude - and that by stating that this is rude to Scottish people I must therefore not have been exposed to the greater rudeness. Neither of these things are true.

    As I'm sure you know, the point was a rhetorical one to highlight the overall tenor here and on DT, rather than an attempt to negate your judgement on an individual post.
  • My goodness the Nats are evolving into something horrid over on WOS and their Facebook page now. Their current narrative is that they hope the poor old people all die soon because they voted No. That the English are all to blame and should be barred from voting 'next time' and that all other No voters are brainwashed cowardly sheep who have robbed the children of Scotland of their future.

    Robbed the dolites of Scotland of more dole more like.

    They are detestable and I thoroughly detest them.
  • zagubov
    zagubov Posts: 17,938 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    danothy wrote: »
    That conclusion does not follow from the premise you present to support it. It implies that relativism overrides absolutes - i.e. that because other things may be said to be ruder, that this is therefore not rude - and that by stating that this is rude to Scottish people I must therefore not have been exposed to the greater rudeness. Neither of these things are true.
    hugoshavez wrote: »
    As I'm sure you know, the point was a rhetorical one to highlight the overall tenor here and on DT, rather than an attempt to negate your judgement on an individual post.

    If you want there's more enlightened and intellectually challenging thought over on the sqapo site. Enjoy!
    There is no honour to be had in not knowing a thing that can be known - Danny Baker
  • Final YouGov poll on 18th by age bracket

    16-24 was 51%-49% NO
    25-39 was 55%-45% YES
    40-59 was 53%-47% NO
    60-64 was 55%-45% NO
    65+....was 66%-34% NO
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
  • IveSeenTheLight
    IveSeenTheLight Posts: 13,322 Forumite
    edited 23 September 2014 at 1:14PM
    Final YouGov poll on 18th by age bracket

    16-24 was 51%-49% NO
    25-39 was 55%-45% YES
    40-59 was 53%-47% NO
    60-64 was 55%-45% NO
    65+....was 66%-34% NO

    Hmm, is this selective bracketing?
    Seems to have differed from your previous graph

    Bx4nobeIcAA1lGu.jpg:large

    This shows

    16-17 - Yes
    25-34 Yes
    35-44 Yes
    45-54 Yes

    18-24 No
    55-64 No
    65+ No

    shows how important the Grey vote was
    :wall:
    What we've got here is....... failure to communicate.
    Some men you just can't reach.
    :wall:
  • Generali
    Generali Posts: 36,411 Forumite
    10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Hmm, is this selective bracketing?
    Seems to have differed from your previous graph

    Bx4nobeIcAA1lGu.jpg:large

    This shows

    16-17 - Yes
    25-34 Yes
    35-44 Yes
    45-54 Yes

    18-24 No
    55-64 No
    65+ No

    shows how important the Grey vote was

    Different sources not selection of age groups. Different polls will have different outcomes because of different sampling errors.
  • HAMISH_MCTAVISH
    HAMISH_MCTAVISH Posts: 28,592 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Photogenic
    edited 23 September 2014 at 1:38PM
    Generali wrote: »
    Different sources not selection of age groups. Different polls will have different outcomes because of different sampling errors.

    Indeed.

    The ashcroft poll posted earlier had a sample size of just 14 respondents for the 16/17 age brackets.

    Too small to be statistically significant.

    The Yougov poll was 3000 respondents in total, and covered both day of voting and post voting responses.

    Final total was within 1% of actual vote.

    Almost certainly as accurate as we'll be able to get.

    And shows No won in 4/5 age brackets.
    “The great enemy of the truth is very often not the lie – deliberate, contrived, and dishonest – but the myth, persistent, persuasive, and unrealistic.

    Belief in myths allows the comfort of opinion without the discomfort of thought.”

    -- President John F. Kennedy”
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.4K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.8K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.4K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.1K Life & Family
  • 257.9K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.