ParkingEye-v-Beavis Appeal: Date Set

Redx

I suppose either side may ask for the higher appeal, depending who it goes against , so not really surprising that either side may wish to appeal it and ask for it to be allowed

doesnt surprise me at all

trubster

Redx wrote: »

I think that was the foolish anthromorphic puppet pig , twin to PINKY and s*** stirring as usual

http://en.wikipedia.org/wiki/Pinky_and_Perky

I did notice the "Oink" in that thread

enfield_freddy

ampersand wrote: »

#
Ditto Freddy and posted as much.
It appeared briefly, about 5 mins ago, then disappeared!
#
Any mysterious phone calls in the offing?

its back again,

trubster

Redx wrote: »

I suppose either side may ask for the higher appeal, depending who it goes against , so not really surprising that either side may wish to appeal it and ask for it to be allowed

doesnt surprise me at all

If Beavis loses, I hope he will fight all the way and get the support he needs to do so.

I am guessing that PE will not want to settle a "No Costs" agreement because they (may) have a ruling that applies to lower courts.

SevenTowers

As there is so much riding on this case, it is virtually certain that whoever the losing side are, they will appeal. As both sides have known the judgement for a few days the request for permission to appeal will already have been sent to the court, and of course the counter-argument for refusing an appeal from the winning side will also have been submitted.

As Bargepole has said above, as well as handing down the judgement, the judges will also grant, or refuse permission to appeal to the Supreme Court.

I don't know if I'll have any fingernails left by 10.30 tomorrow morning........

bargepole

One thing I should have added to the post above:


For the attention of the MSE Forum Team - I'll start a new thread for this, with the title PARKING EYE v BEAVIS: THE RESULT.


You had better make sure there is plenty of server capacity, or the forum will go into meltdown.

enfield_freddy

look forward to hearing the results and analysis in your own words


"one sleep to go"

trubster

bargepole wrote: »

One thing I should have added to the post above:


For the attention of the MSE Forum Team - I'll start a new thread for this, with the title PARKING EYE v BEAVIS: THE RESULT.


You had better make sure there is plenty of server capacity, or the forum will go into meltdown.

Request Denied.

You can call it either

PARKING EYE v BEAVIS: BEAVIS WINS!

or

PARKING EYE v BEAVIS: PARKING EYE WINS!

You must submit a revised request for permission to post with the correct title in the next 5 minutes.

Thanks.

The (Pretend) Forum Team

enfield_freddy

you forgot to include your throwaway email address

trubster

BPA_News_Page wrote:

Beavis v ParkingEye - verdict due tomorrow
22 April 2015
We are aware that the Court of Appeal decision regarding the ParkingEye vs Beavis case will be made tomorrow morning.

Chief Executive Patrick Troy will be attending and we will be seeking to communicate to you our informed comment as soon as we have been able to fully digest the decision and any implications this may have for the sector.

Any questions should be directed to media@britishparking.co.uk.

I am sure they would already know...

http://www.dailymail.co.uk/money/cars/article-3050822/Motorists-set-refunds-millions-depending-outcome-landmark-case-tickets-issued-private-land.html