We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
stop/start
Options
Comments
-
-
No trolling by definition is taking over a thread, arguing for the sake of it and not "letting go"
I don't think there is anyone on this thread who would think that doesn't apply to you
Where have you got that definition from? Doesnt sound quite right.
Check wiki if you are unsure, I think google used to define it too.0 -
atrixblue.-MFR-. wrote: »wrong again
What? That reply doesnt make sense. Wrong about what?0 -
As a statment of fact usually aimed at mg repeated posts. The reply isnt going to change is it? Im not stateing it out right and presenting it as new, you see?
Eh, what? You have said the same thing time and time again, regardless of whether you "present it as new", your argument was that "I, unlike you, do not replicate my posts". I fail to see what (of your own statement) you do not understand.
Then again, you don't understand how quoting someone or works, or how heaters work, so why should we expect you to understand what you're even saying?0 -
A simple list and you couldn't even read it! Honestly, even a five year old can read!
No. How dare you say my list is wrong! It is a subjective opinion of what I disagree with that you have said. How you can possibly say that one of them is wrong I do not know.
And, I refer you to post #143. You are obviously familiar with the idea that one posts something, then replies directly to individual parts of the quote in red text. This is not new to you.
Because the majority of the things you have listed arent wrong barring the faux career advice. Quite simple really. Cant read? You are one to jump to silly conclusions arent you? How would that work:rotfl:0 -
-
Because the majority of the things you have listed arent wrong barring the faux career advice. Quite simple really. Cant read? You are one to jump to silly conclusions arent you? How would that work:rotfl:
Have you forgotten what you asked me? You asked me to make a list of all the things I disagreed with. The fact that they are also wrong is just a coincidence. Again, not jumping to silly conclusions, you just can't remember your own argument.0 -
As a statment of fact usually aimed at mg repeated posts. The reply isnt going to change is it? Im not stateing it out right and presenting it as new, you see?
You keep saying we aren't being clear or you never said this or that so I'm repeating them for you so you have no further excuses0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 350.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.4K Spending & Discounts
- 243.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.8K Life & Family
- 256.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards