stop/start

atrixblue.-MFR-.

topdaddy wrote: »

Because the majority of the things you have listed arent wrong barring the faux career advice. Quite simple really. Cant read? You are one to jump to silly conclusions arent you? How would that work:rotfl:

it doesn't because it doesn't work like that;)

topdaddy_2

atrixblue.-MFR-. wrote: »

I don't have to explain or give an explanation, ill just keep repeating your wrong or wrong again when you are wrong.

motorguy wrote: »

It doesn't work like that

It does when your reply isnt contextual. Your wrong is a perfectly good answer when appropiate but not there is nothing to be wrong about. IE I cannot be wrong in asking the question to which you replied. Unles you are saying you did google it but then you wouldnt have said you are wrong, the response could have simply been Yes or I did.

atrixblue.-MFR-.

topdaddy wrote: »

It does when your reply isnt contextual. Your wrong is a perfectly good answer when appropiate but not there is nothing to be wrong about. IE I cannot be wrong in asking the question to which you replied. Unles you are saying you did google it but then you wouldnt have said you are wrong, the response could have simply been Yes or I did.

now now stop assuming or jumping to concusions it doesn't work like that. OH your wrong!:p

topdaddy_2

F1F93 wrote: »

Have you forgotten what you asked me? You asked me to make a list of all the things I disagreed with. The fact that they are also wrong is just a coincidence. Again, not jumping to silly conclusions, you just can't remember your own argument.

No conincedence, do you not remember what was asked? Refresh your memory. I said mg is wrong a lot(he is) , you countered with an approximation that you felt that applys to my self, I invited you to write a list of what you disagree with beacuse its wrong. Do try to keep up.

motorguy

topdaddy wrote: »

It does when your reply isnt contextual. Your wrong is a perfectly good answer when appropiate but not there is nothing to be wrong about. IE I cannot be wrong in asking the question to which you replied. Unles you are saying you did google it but then you wouldnt have said you are wrong, the response could have simply been Yes or I did.

It doesn't work like that

topdaddy_2

motorguy wrote: »

You keep saying we aren't being clear or you never said this or that so I'm repeating them for you so you have no further excuses

The lack of clarity comes from the mentioning if electrical heating elements, central heating, kettles etc. You hold me responsible for those?

motorguy

topdaddy wrote: »

No conincedence, do you not remember what was asked? Refresh your memory. I said mg is wrong a lot(he is) , you countered with an approximation that you felt that applys to my self, I invited you to write a list of what you disagree with beacuse its wrong. Do try to keep up.

You're wrong.

topdaddy_2

motorguy wrote: »

It doesn't work like that

atrixblue.-MFR-. wrote: »

now now stop assuming or jumping to concusions it doesn't work like that. OH your wrong!:p

It does cos thats how language works. Its not debatable.

motorguy

topdaddy wrote: »

The lack of clarity comes from the mentioning if electrical heating elements, central heating, kettles etc. You hold me responsible for those?

It doesn't work like that

topdaddy_2

motorguy wrote: »

You're wrong.

Not .