Unhappy With Postage Charged By Seller & Actual Postage Seller Paid

plumface

ToThePoint wrote: »

You haven't answered mine? You can't even admit you bully others on grammar. At least admit you did it to poster..... victor meldrew jnr in 'Is it legal for ebay to take commission from seller's postage?' and it was post #133 you quoted.

But as I have to keep repeating, your vile comments got removed, as other forum members didn't agree with you. (Those posts got removed to) Including MINE to you

What vile comments?
Any answer to the questions to do with the actual topic?

"SILENCE IS GOLDEN, GOLDEN"

Alias_Omega

On the other hand...


I undercharged postage... Charged Buyer £5.00, Postage costs inc Bubble Wrap was £15.10.

Postage - £11.70
Bubble Wrap - £2.40
Tape - £1

Ah well..

ToThePoint

plumface wrote: »

What vile comments?
Any answer to the questions to do with the actual topic?

"SILENCE IS GOLDEN, GOLDEN"

What like your comment on my signature?

The vile comment which you made a big deal out of a poster saying loose instead of lose. AGAIN I have to repeat myself, because you do not read posts. You must remember now? Where you used lots of :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

You can't even be bloody honest about it, say's a lot about your manners.


victor meldrew jnr in 'Is it legal for ebay to take commission from seller's postage?' and it was post #133 you quoted


REMEMBER the post got REMOVED by the mods....
In fact it's on the 1st page of Google if you search. Doesn't show the whole post, but shows the start of it....

plumface

QUOTE=ToThePoint;66192311]What like your comment on my signature?

The vile comment which you made a big deal out of a poster saying loose instead of lose. AGAIN I have to repeat myself, because you do not read posts. You must remember now? Where you used lots of :mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad::mad:

You can't even be bloody honest about it, say's a lot about your manners.

victor meldrew jnr in 'Is it legal for ebay to take commission from seller's postage?' and it was post #133 you quoted


REMEMBER the post got REMOVED by the mods....
In fact it's on the 1st page of Google if you search. Doesn't show the whole post, but shows the start of it....[/QUOTE]

eg item price £8 including the £3.50 post cost.
eg buyer buys 10 items at £80 total now INCLUDING £35 post costs.

So to reiterate you will happily pay £35 postage costs on freepost but
will feel ripped off if i charged £45 plus £35 p&p for the same items?
Still paying the same money in both instances.

So, still no answer?

ToThePoint

plumface wrote: »

So, still no answer?

Thought I'd get a reply like that, wonder why :rotfl:

Answer me why you bully other people's posts?

Google, Google, Google.

I never said I'd pay that. I said other buyers will. How hard is it to read posts?

I have the issue with postage and packing, and not 'free postage'. Which I have kept saying, which you also keep quoting. So I thought you may have read the post you keep 'quoting'. But alas, it shall be a long night.

RFW

Can someone box this thread up and ship it. I'm happy to pay the postage and packing:p

FidgitsID

ToThePoint wrote: »

But as I have to keep repeating, your vile comments got removed, as other forum members didn't agree with you. (Those posts got removed to) Including MINE to you

Just because posts got removed, does not imply that "other forum members did not agree with" with the main points being made. But I understand why you are trying to put that spin on it :rotfl:

FidgitsID

ToThePoint wrote: »

But as I have to keep repeating, your vile comments got removed, as other forum members didn't agree with you. (Those posts got removed to) Including MINE to you

I never saw the "vile" comments, but since both of your posts have been removed, that just means that it might have been something in either of your posts, noone except the mod knows the exact reason for removal.

I must say the only "vile" thing I have seen in this thread is the morality shown below

ToThePoint wrote: »

Well these 'dumb buyers' will leave you 1* across the board.

So it WILL COUNT

ToThePoint

FidgitsID wrote: »

Just because posts got removed, does not imply that "other forum members did not agree with" with the main points being made. But I understand why you are trying to put that spin on it :rotfl:

Well they obviously didn't agree, as they got removed with mine. It is petty and wrong to mock others on spelling. So you're saying it's right to pick on posts, just because they said loose, instead of lose? Seriously?

FidgitsID wrote: »

I never saw the "vile" comments, but since both of your posts have been removed, that just means that it might have been something in either of your posts, noone except the mod knows the exact reason for removal.

I must say the only "vile" thing I have seen in this thread is the morality shown below

Why did I say that? Because the poster made a song and dance, how postage stars mean nothing. So the seller can get away with what they like? But of course, you forgot to put that little snippet in :cool:
Least I don't deny what I say, unlike some! Also sellers are finding way's to 'avoid' defects. Where is the 'morality' in that?

So if you get rubbish service off a seller, then your supposed to give them 5* across the board? It's ridiculous.

FidgitsID

ToThePoint wrote: »

So you're saying it's right to pick on posts, just because they said loose, instead of lose? Seriously?

I never said that, but you do seem to like putting words into other peoples mouth dont you :cool: