PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING
Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum. This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are - or become - political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
FTB Help please - To buy or not to buy?
WishfulThinker23
Posts: 4 Newbie
The situation:
Note: the sellers solicitor is a relative of the seller and also acted when she originally purchased.
Offer accepted on a 2 and a half year old house built on land previously owned by the council. Covenant in deeds for the land states:
the purchasers shall not at any time erect construct or allow on the said land any other building or erection of any kind whatsoever except garden sheds or garages until specifications have been submitted to and approved by the council as Council (The purchasers paying a fee of £5 for every such approval)
Our solicitor can find no proof of such covenant approval, either for the house or subsequent conservatory built, or pp for the dropped kerb at the front, and has requested this from seller.
Sellers solicitor says that proof doesn't exist, and isn't needed. He previously said they would take out indemnity, but now refuses to do so and advises that the buyers (us) will have to pay this. Our solicitor is seeing if insurance companies will cover this risk and if lender will still lend, but feels that something is dodgy and perhaps the sellers solicitor missed a trick the first time round and is covering his tracks.
Would you take the risk of no covenant approval on such a young property, even with indemnity insurance? And given that the sellers solicitor is a relative, and may have made mistakes?
Any advice really appreciated
Note: the sellers solicitor is a relative of the seller and also acted when she originally purchased.
Offer accepted on a 2 and a half year old house built on land previously owned by the council. Covenant in deeds for the land states:
the purchasers shall not at any time erect construct or allow on the said land any other building or erection of any kind whatsoever except garden sheds or garages until specifications have been submitted to and approved by the council as Council (The purchasers paying a fee of £5 for every such approval)
Our solicitor can find no proof of such covenant approval, either for the house or subsequent conservatory built, or pp for the dropped kerb at the front, and has requested this from seller.
Sellers solicitor says that proof doesn't exist, and isn't needed. He previously said they would take out indemnity, but now refuses to do so and advises that the buyers (us) will have to pay this. Our solicitor is seeing if insurance companies will cover this risk and if lender will still lend, but feels that something is dodgy and perhaps the sellers solicitor missed a trick the first time round and is covering his tracks.
Would you take the risk of no covenant approval on such a young property, even with indemnity insurance? And given that the sellers solicitor is a relative, and may have made mistakes?
Any advice really appreciated
0
Comments
-
If someone has asked for proof of approval and been told there isn't any it is likely it will be impossible to get indemnity insurance. Is there planning permission for the original house? Surely there must be, so that counts as approval. It all sounds very odd to me. I would walk away.0
-
Hello,
Thanks for your reply!
Only the sellers solicitor has been asked for proof of covenant approval. As he acted for the seller when she was a buyer, I would have thought this should be available. I understand that we have no chance of indemnity insurance if the council gets involved.
There is planning permission for the house. But not for the dropped kerb at the front (or again, no such proof).
Sadly that's the way we are beginning to think. It's so hard to know what to do as ftb's.
Does anyone have an idea how often/likely the council are to discover and enforce such breaches?0
This discussion has been closed.
Categories
- All Categories
- 345.8K Banking & Borrowing
- 251K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 450.9K Spending & Discounts
- 237.8K Work, Benefits & Business
- 612.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 174.3K Life & Family
- 250.9K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 15.1K Coronavirus Support Boards