We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Used car turbo failure

Options
13567

Comments

  • Hmm. I'm reading around this. OFT Guidance for second hand car dealers, sec 9.25:

    "It is important that the repair or replacement is carried out within a
    reasonable time and without causing significant inconvenience to the
    consumer.
    You must also bear any costs associated with doing so such as
    transporting the vehicle to a garage for repairs."

    Is this binding upon the dealer? Or does this only apply if there is a major fault? But how am I, a consumer, meant to know? All I know is that the car keeps telling me the turbo's failing.
  • motorguy
    motorguy Posts: 22,611 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Literally only just bought it - a couple of weeks ago.

    Dealer is utterly insistant that he wants to look at it himself. I want to take the line that the car is unsafe to drive on the motorway - I've been told that the turbo is likely to cut out completely very soon. Can I insist he collects?

    I would be making the dealer aware of your concerns and ask if hes happy for you to take the risk in driving the car to him. I certainly wouldnt be doing over 50mph and keep the revs below 1500, so its "off the turbo" as it were.

    Say you have concerns that the turbo might fail on the way and see what he says.

    All you can do really.
  • When this thing goes into limp mode, 50mph would be very ambitious! 30mph might have been achievable.
  • Just to close this thread off, in case someone comes across it in the future:

    The dealer continued to refuse to play ball. His final offer was that I drive it to him and then he'd give me a courtesy car, which I declined as I was unhappy about driving it around the M25 with increasingly-frequent failures.

    I then set about diagnosing and fixing the fault myself. Astoundingly it turned out that a Skoda dealer had not applied a software update (but had logged that the update was installed on the Skoda UK register). When my Skoda dealer looked it over, it took them about half an hour to update the software (free, as this was supposed to have been a recall operation) and the car's been perfectly fine ever since.

    So I never ended up testing the small claims court's attitude to who should have paid for a new turbo. About the only useful thing I learned from this is that if you have a VAG 1.2TSi engine that keeps cutting out and giving fault codes 11825 P334B (mechanical failure of wastegate actuator) then make absolutely sure that you've got the most up-to-date software on board before you change the turbo.

    Cheers
    Jamie
  • colino
    colino Posts: 5,059 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    You do know that the software update desensitises the car to what was previously considered out of range sensor readings? It is about as close to a fix as a dealer telling you if you have a hole half way up your petrol tank, not to fill it up.
  • sabretoothtigger
    sabretoothtigger Posts: 10,036 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Combo Breaker
    edited 26 June 2014 at 6:26PM
    Does seem very strange, software fault but on a modern car I guess its possible. Dam awful software if true and what colino said might be correct (I think its worth a go not dangerous ?)
    Its a strange case either way that such bad behaviour occurs so easily.

    One for an owners forum

    ECU update can drastically alter operation, usually its something to do with the hoops they jump through for emissions

    I used to know a garage boss who regularly charged 50+ for ecu trickery, when he mentioned to his boss the test cost only took a few minutes so should cost less; they should be more reasonable in applying fixes and costs, he was then given the high jump. Bit of an industry secret for profit reasons, in that case at least
    So I never ended up testing the small claims court's attitude to who should have paid for a new turbo.
    Ive been in a similar sort of fix and you have to trailer it (like you I was lucky to find an 'easy' fix). Cost me under 100 to get a range rover man and his trailer passing by to do it, which is cheap/lucky. The dealer was being reasonable; from my view and maybe the courts
  • harveybobbles
    harveybobbles Posts: 8,973 Forumite
    So the dealer says he wants me to return the car to be rectified.

    I'm not too keen on this, partly because it costs me two days

    Damned annoyed by this, not least because if they'd bothered to test the car before selling it the fault would have been obvious.

    Thanks, all.

    Gosh..

    At the end oif the day, YOU chose to buy the car from that dealer, knowing that should a faukt arrive, YOU would have to take the car back to them..

    As for the SOG etc, the dealer will have to be givben the chance to fix the car - which tyey are doing.



    also, they would have driven the car before offering it for sale. Warning lights come on. thats cars for you.
  • Joe_Horner
    Joe_Horner Posts: 4,895 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary Combo Breaker
    colino wrote: »
    You do know that the software update desensitises the car to what was previously considered out of range sensor readings? It is about as close to a fix as a dealer telling you if you have a hole half way up your petrol tank, not to fill it up.

    That depends whether the range in the original software was correct or not.
  • Colino: this was a universal recall issued on every 1.2TSi Yeti (in fact, I'm not sure it wasn't issued on every 1.2TSi Skoda) and became standard issue in MY2011. I knew about it but hadn't considered it as a possibility as Skoda UK had it logged as having been applied in 2012. The Skoda dealer who installed it was as surprised as me to find it hadn't actually been done.

    As for it just being a desensitisation - my limited understanding is that the potentiometer on the wastegate gets hotter under extended boost than anticipated giving it a slightly elevated reading, so the update just extends the acceptable range of readings to incorporate this false positive. So yes, it's a desensitisation, but only in that it desensitises it to an alarm that shouldn't have been happening.

    Harvey: well, I did choose to buy from them, but on the strength of a 'warranty' that they explicitly told me would not require me to take the car back to them. When I tried to call on that, they baulked. And the OFT guidance I quoted above seems to suggest the cost would have been on them anyway. But as I said, I have not had to (and, it seems, will not need to) test this in court. Hope that remains the case.
  • Smi1er
    Smi1er Posts: 642 Forumite
    About the only useful thing I learned from this is that if you have a VAG 1.2TSi engine that keeps cutting out and giving fault codes 11825 P334B (mechanical failure of wastegate actuator) then make absolutely sure that you've got the most up-to-date software on board before you change the turbo.

    So you didn't learn that if you want to buy a £10K car then you should select a dealer who offers a bit more than a six month warranty with a £500 claim limit?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.9K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.6K Spending & Discounts
  • 244K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.9K Life & Family
  • 257.2K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.