Best way to transport uninsured car

Mark_Mark

Spam reported.

Mark_Mark

londonTiger wrote: »

So daft, some people like to clutch at straws just to win an argument, this is a consumer forum. It us assumed everyone here is a consumer, if op had trade insurance that he paid 5x more than consumer insurance I don't think he'll come here seeking advice.

It's like someone starting a thread on worst mpg cars and then someone trying to one up by saying a tank has 1mpg or something. Playground nonsense

Have you actually read section 143?

mrs-moneypenny

Mark_Mark wrote: »

Spam reported.

and here. theyve done 8 identical posts across the forum:mad:

Jamie_Carter

Mark_Mark wrote: »

Keep saying that doesn't make you right.

If your policy covers you the other vehicle need not have a policy.

I guess you've never seen a trade policy with sdp.

It doesn't make you right either.


I am insured to drive any vehicle, but the vehicle also has to have it's own insurance that might not cover me.


As I said, we are not even talking about trader policies. It would only be legal for a trader who holds such a policy to use it in connection with their business, and not just to do someone a favour. The only way a trader policy could be used would be if they were carrying out the MOT on the car.

Mark_Mark

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

It doesn't make you right either.


I am insured to drive any vehicle, but the vehicle also has to have it's own insurance that might not cover me.


As I said, we are not even talking about trader policies. It would only be legal for a trader who holds such a policy to use it in connection with their business, and not just to do someone a favour. The only way a trader policy could be used would be if they were carrying out the MOT on the car.

That is a condition of your policy not legislation.


I guess you've never seen a traders policy covering social use?

Jamie_Carter

Mark_Mark wrote: »

That is a condition of your policy not legislation.


I guess you've never seen a traders policy covering social use?

That would be where a trader takes a car home that is in the possession of the trader. It does not cover 'doing a mate a favour'.


I see someone has returned under yet another name!!

Jamie_Carter

Mark_Mark wrote: »

Have you actually read section 143?

Have you???

Mark_Mark

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

That would be where a trader takes a car home that is in the possession of the trader. It does not cover 'doing a mate a favour'.


I see someone has returned under yet another name!!

To and from work is committing is it not?

Doing a mate a favour isn't business so is covered under sdp.

Mark_Mark

Jamie_Carter wrote: »

Have you???

I have and it even covers a vehicle having no insurance at all and still being legal.

Jamie_Carter

Mark_Mark wrote: »

To and from work is committing is it not?

Doing a mate a favour isn't business so is covered under sdp.

No it isn't, because the vehicle isn't owned by, or being used in connection with the trader.