We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
MOT test for 7 seater Chrysler Voyager
Options
Comments
-
Quiet_Spark wrote: »No backpedalling at all, but you'd make for a good journo with the selective quoting
Selective? I quoted the _entire_ post to give the context for your denial...0 -
Selective? I quoted the _entire_ post to give the context for your denial...Understeer is when you hit a wall with the front of your car
Oversteer is when you hit a wall with the back of your car
Horsepower is how fast your car hits the wall
Torque is how far your car sends the wall across the field once you've hit it0 -
Quiet_Spark wrote: »If you quoted the "entire" response, what happened to the example I gave about motorcycle indicators?
No, your previous post. The one you were wriggling to justify. Number 8 in the thread.0 -
blackshirtuk wrote: »when mot'ing my seven seater, i asked the exact same question.
The response I got was "it depends" they said if the seatbelts were attached to the car body then the seats had to present to be able to test them, if the seatbelts were part of the seats then when seats were out there was nothing to test.
That's a bit inaccurate as the requirement for a seatbelt is determined by having a seat to go with it. If there's a seatbelt and no seat there's no need for the belt, therefore it doesn't need to be tested. In the second row of seats on something like a Renault Espace the seats are all removable, yet the outboard belts are anchored to the body and the receivers on the seat. If the seat was removed it'd be harsh to fail it for the belt not being able to fastened.0 -
That's a bit inaccurate as the requirement for a seatbelt is determined by having a seat to go with it. If there's a seatbelt and no seat there's no need for the belt, therefore it doesn't need to be tested. In the second row of seats on something like a Renault Espace the seats are all removable, yet the outboard belts are anchored to the body and the receivers on the seat. If the seat was removed it'd be harsh to fail it for the belt not being able to fastened.
Is the correct answer, its only a seatbelt if there is a seat.If it isn't broken, don't try to fix it.0 -
Suggestion-IF i have a faulty belt for a seat.
If I remove seat for said belt am I ok for MOT?0 -
No, your previous post. The one you were wriggling to justify. Number 8 in the thread.Understeer is when you hit a wall with the front of your car
Oversteer is when you hit a wall with the back of your car
Horsepower is how fast your car hits the wall
Torque is how far your car sends the wall across the field once you've hit it0 -
Yep as I said earlier, it's quite common with Landrovers.0
-
Quiet_Spark wrote: »If you quoted the "entire" response, what happened to the example I gave about motorcycle indicators?
When you "revealed" that only testable items are ........testable? Insightful0 -
trollopscarletwoman wrote: »Suggestion-IF i have a faulty belt for a seat.
If I remove seat for said belt am I ok for MOT?
Yes - but if you put the seat back in and someone sits on it you'll possibly regret it.
Perhaps it's a 'crime' as you would then knowingly be letting someone use a faulty seatbelt.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards