Vendetta against Parking Eye

Redx

methinks they doth protesteth too mucho , therefore they are guilty by default

if they stop using stupid rules, templates of their own making , ignoring the rights of others , check that they actually do have a legal basis for bringing these court actions, stop abusing the small claims court system just to try to line their own pockets, stop trying to make the uk legal system like they see on USA tv shows like boston legal , stop creating fictitious witnesses for creative or fictitious or incorrectly dated paperwork , stop imposing their will upon others, stop taking disabled pensioners to court , abide by the EA 2010 and any other laws like the unfair contracts law etc

and actually do the job they are paid to do !

then maybe, just maybe , people would stop advising the common person to stand up to them

but the golden rule is to stand up to bullies and dont let them get away with it, dont hand over your "dinner money" fight for whats right and proper in each and every case, let justice be served by common sense and compassion

they brought it upon themselves, so should be a lesson to all other PPC,s out there, learn a lesson and start abiding by the rules yourselves

the more court cases they lose, the more evidence builds up against them all and the more court case judgements people can cite in their own defences

Stroma

There you go prankster has now picked up on this

http://parking-prankster.blogspot.co.uk/2014/02/parkingeye-accuse-forums-of-vendetta-in.html

spacey2012

I would love to be a fly on the wall:
Judge : What is the merits of the case:

LPC Goon: they have breached this contract your honour;

Judge to defendant : have you ever seen this contract ?
Defendant : No
Judge To LPC Goon Why ?
LPC goon because there is a vendetta against us !
Judge : so you claim the defendant has breeched a contract clause in a contract they have never seen because you refuse to show them it due to a vendetta ?

LPC goon : Yes that is correct;

Judge : have you ever wondered why you have to do agency work and can not get a real job ? Close the door on the way out please.

These are the goons they are sending to court on behalf of a multi million pound outfit.

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:

Priceless, absolute 24 carat plated priceless.

trisontana

From LPC Law's website:-

Quality is extremely important to us. We were the first nationwide law firm to introduce compulsory assessments for our advocates and because of our continued dedication to this you are guaranteed to receive the best possible representation.

We guarantee attendance at every county court for fixed fees and we will take care of all payments to advocates and clerks. Should you ever feel we have failed to deliver the desired standard of service, you will not be charged.

If I was PE I should ask for my money back.

The_Deep

These are the goons they are sending to court on behalf of a multi million pound outfit.

Have you any idea how hard it is to get a training contract after graduation? I had a tenant who was asolicitor. She wrote two thousand letters before she was accepted.

My daughter studied law, but refused to train to be a solicitor, she said that most law was blindingly dull and only superstars were accepted for the sexier positions. Imagine, being a conveyancing solicitor and doing the same job day after day, no wonder many of them run off with the tea float.

As for family law, all those warring couples.

Hot_Bring

"The lpc person did not hand out the contract. The judge said it should have been supplied and the lpc person said that there is a "vendetta" against parking eye on online forums and that supplying contracts breaks confidentiality laws with their clients. The judge said this was rubbish and the contract should be supplied. "

What laws would these be then Parking Eye ?? If you don't know the difference between a LAW and a confidentiality CLAUSE then you and Rachel are even MORE stupid than you've already made yourself look.

So let's see how brave Parking Eye really are :

"Parking Eye are constantly breaking the law - i.e. the Equality Act. They bully people into paying them money they are not entitled to."

This is the view of Hot Bring and not moneysavingexpert.com. If Parking Eye had the guts they would now sue Hot Bring but being the cowardly, insignificant molecules of carbon matter that they really are they will chicken out of doing so.

Hot_Bring

The_Slithy_Tove wrote: »

Yet it has been mooted that there is a link between Capita's purchase of PE and them being awarded the Congestion Charge contract, it that they can make use of PE's ANPR technology. This may well be just forum speculation, though. Surely PE's technology would not satisfy the standards needed for the CC, which would need to be far more rigorous.

I'm an ex-Capita employee I don't agree. Capita has had a contract with TfL for many years covering various services - some linked to congestion charging. Any new contract is just an extension and highly unlikely to have anything to do with the purchase of PE.

4consumerrights

Hot_Bring wrote: »

"
What laws would these be then Parking Eye ?? If you don't know the difference between a LAW and a confidentiality CLAUSE then you and Rachel are even MORE stupid than you've already made yourself look.

.

YEP THAT WOULD BE CLAUSE 16 OF THEIR STANDARD TERMS AND CONDITIONS IN THEIR CONTRACT

*****************************************************

"

The lpc person did not hand out the contract. The judge said it should have been supplied and the lpc person said that there is a "vendetta" against parking eye on online forums and that supplying contracts breaks confidentiality laws with their clients. The judge said this was rubbish and the contract should be supplied.

Hi Parking eye, we're sorry to hear you feel this way and would like to help. If you're able to send all details to our forum customer services team by emailing:
[EMAIL="forumassistedpeclaims@nogpeol.com"]forumassistedpeclaims@nogpeol.com[/EMAIL],
a member of the team will be able to look into this as they are better placed to assist with parking eye queries of this nature.

edward123

I hate Parking Eye. MSE mods altered my signature because I said they operated a scam and PE made a specific complaint about it. So, was well pleased about how I have annoyed them. But my signature still specifies them not just PPC world. So whatever forum I post on(see here for instance in Savings and Investments)Parking Eye gets a mention.

bargepole

trisontana wrote: »

... If I was PE I should ask for my money back.

To be fair to LPC, it's not really their fault that so many cases are being lost.

PE provide them with witness statements riddled with untruths, and possibly containing perjury; they provide landowner witness statements which don't comply with any of the CPR rules for the correct form of such statements; and they provide a bundle (aka the blizzard) of largely irrelevant legal arguments, with no page numbers, which even a legally trained person such as a Judge would have difficulty following.

Then as a last resort, they supply a copy of the landowner contract, which is so heavily redacted that no worthwhile conclusion can be drawn from it.

As the LPC Solicitor Advocate at my last hearing agreed, PE are asking the LPC reps to fight with one hand tied behind their back. They shouldn't therefore be surprised when they emerge from court bloodied and beaten.