We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

House Sold - Buyers want to make a claim


I have been advised our buyers wishesto make a claim for us to pay for the removal of old radiator pipes that werein the living room. When we moved in theprevious owners had removed a single radiator in the living room to make morespace to put furniture in for the sofa etc so they had left 2 small bolts/old radiatorfittings in the living room. We livedwith it and also put our own sofa over them. They are very small, small enough to easily fit under any sofa. We choose to not have them removed in case someonein the future wanted to replace the radiator.


So we have now had a claim to state that because they were unaware they werethere, they want us to pay for them to be removed as they wish to fit a carpetover the wooden flooring we had. Theystate they can’t fit a carpet because of it. Which they could easily do and do as we did and place their furniture accordingly. It was not a large living room, so the placesfor sofa’s etc are very limited, that’s why the radiator was removed. The old radiator fittings are sealed off andare in no way hazardous.



I have already responded to state I am not willing to payfor the removal and do not wish to pay for their choice to improve theproperty. The heating is working as itis supposed to be. Just wondering ifanyone had any opinions?
«134

Comments

  • Cissi
    Cissi Posts: 1,131 Forumite
    If they come back to you, just ignore them. In England and Wales houses are bought as seen and it's buyers beware. It's their problem if their survey didn't reveal this.
  • I'm no expert, but I thought caveat emptor (buyer beware) applies when buying houses. I.e. it is the responsibility of the buyer to make themselves aware of any issue with the property (hence the reasons for surveys, conveyance checks etc.). Assuming they did not ask about them and you then lied, I cannot see how they have a leg to stand on
  • I would decline to respond further to them at all, apart from if a "Letter before Action" or court papers arrive.

    That your buyers were stupid enough not to have a very good look round the place themselves nor get an informal 2nd opinion nor engage a surveyor & pay him enough to point out such things & then be daft enough to threaten you is ...
    a) Very common.. typical even..
    b) there problem not yours..
    c) Not the sort of thing most people would want to do for fear of become a laughing stock.

    However there's no law against being stupid or acting stupid.. Ah, good old British freedoms eh??

    Wonder of the buyers are viewing this thread?? Have they anything to say??

    Cheers!
  • sinizterguy
    sinizterguy Posts: 1,178 Forumite
    The buyers responsibility to check all these things before exchange (not even completion).

    You could check with your solicitor, who will confirm, that you can politely or otherwise, tell them to stop bothering you.
  • Dan-Dan
    Dan-Dan Posts: 5,279 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    tell then to go forth and muliply , cheeky beggars
    Never, under any circumstances, take a sleeping pill and a laxative on the same night.
  • Don't waste your time responding to any more correspondence from them. It's not your problem it's theirs.
    An opinion is just that..... An opinion
  • DRP
    DRP Posts: 4,287 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    Suze012 wrote: »

    I have been advised our buyers wishesto make a claim for us to pay for the removal of old radiator pipes that werein the living room. When we moved in theprevious owners had removed a single radiator in the living room to make morespace to put furniture in for the sofa etc so they had left 2 small bolts/old radiatorfittings in the living room. We livedwith it and also put our own sofa over them. They are very small, small enough to easily fit under any sofa. We choose to not have them removed in case someonein the future wanted to replace the radiator.


    So we have now had a claim to state that because they were unaware they werethere, they want us to pay for them to be removed as they wish to fit a carpetover the wooden flooring we had. Theystate they can’t fit a carpet because of it. Which they could easily do and do as we did and place their furniture accordingly. It was not a large living room, so the placesfor sofa’s etc are very limited, that’s why the radiator was removed. The old radiator fittings are sealed off andare in no way hazardous.



    I have already responded to state I am not willing to payfor the removal and do not wish to pay for their choice to improve theproperty. The heating is working as itis supposed to be. Just wondering ifanyone had any opinions?

    Presuming you have exchanged and completed then they have absolutely no claim.

    Who passed on this information ? Your selling agent? Your solicitor?

    It sounds like such a minor problem that would cost a few quid to sort out...
  • maninthestreet
    maninthestreet Posts: 16,127 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture
    Did this claim come direct from the buyers, or via a solicitor?
    "You were only supposed to blow the bl**dy doors off!!"
  • googler
    googler Posts: 16,103 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    It's their problem, full stop.

    The pipes were essentially in full view when they viewed, IF they'd taken the trouble to look at the property properly, not just a cursory glance.
  • Gordon_Hose
    Gordon_Hose Posts: 6,259 Forumite
    Debt-free and Proud!
    googler wrote: »
    It's their problem, full stop.

    The pipes were essentially in full view when they viewed, IF they'd taken the trouble to look at the property properly, not just a cursory glance.

    Wasn't the sofa hiding them?
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259.1K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.