We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
IMPORTANT: Please make sure your posts do not contain any personally identifiable information (both your own and that of others). When uploading images, please take care that you have redacted all personal information including number plates, reference numbers and QR codes (which may reveal vehicle information when scanned).
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
[ARCHIVE] Popla Decisions
Comments
-
Not his real name, surely!You never know how far you can go until you go too far.0
-
Because they are retards.0
-
Surely that's past the 100 mark now for PE!0
-
4consumerrights wrote: »Surely that's past the 100 mark now for PE!
Gottabe :TPlease note, we are not a legal advice forum. I personally don't get involved in critiquing court case Defences/Witness Statements, so unable to help on that front. Please don't ask. .
I provide only my personal opinion, it is not a legal opinion, it is simply a personal one. I am not a lawyer.
Give a man a fish, and you feed him for a day; show him how to catch fish, and you feed him for a lifetime.Private Parking Firms - Killing the High Street0 -
Me too!!!!0
-
I will repeat, my comment had nothing to do with the original thread, which you are so insistent that I read, it is about all cases concerning drivers stopping, (not parling), on Airport roads, and some railways stations. Therefore, my choice of its inclusion in this Section is, I believe the correct one,
I agree that there are far too many "me too" posts on these threads, but I am satisfied that mine was not one of them.
My question is a legitimate matter for debate, wjy are you so reluctant so to do? Why do so many of you encourage the punters to go for the easy win on GPOL, a victory on relevant land, or stopping is not parking would damage the PPCs far more.
I think it is a very good matter for debate, why not start a separate thread?
It is rather misplaced here which I thought is supposed to be just a list of POPLA decisions for reference!0 -
Thanks very much to Redx for taking the time to highlight the off-topic posts from the POPLA Decisions thread.
I've now moved them into this archive thread with Coupon-mad's post at the top which she can of course edit as appropriate (with great power comes great responsibility CM
). 0 -
another win against VCS at JLA on not a gpeol , post #67 https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/4644637
Just beat me to it:D0 -
Looks like the penny might be dropping for PE and some of the other scummers. [might just be wishful thinking on my part
]
If they see a decent defence [GPEOL or authority] at initial POPLA appeal stage they are dropping it.
Of course if you are one of the thousands that appeals on mitigation claims then they will continue.0 -
They cannot afford to not defend these or not give people a POPLA code.
If word was to get out that they would fold at the thought of going to POPLA their whole business model would collapse.
They also need to keep taking they odd few people to court .... Same business strategy.The word "gullible" isn't in the dictionaryTickets: 19 [cancelled: 18, paid: 0, pending: 1]
PPC Appeals: 8 [accepted: 2, rejected: 5, pending: 1]
POPLA: 4 [accepted: 4, rejected: 0, pending: 0]0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.7K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.4K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454K Spending & Discounts
- 244.7K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.3K Life & Family
- 258.4K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards