We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Good Old Fergus!
Comments
-
ruggedtoast wrote: »And it's made them so happy.
My point of objection about the Wilsons is that Mortgage Express should have foreclosed on them. If it were you or I unable to meet our mortgage payments that is what would have happened to us.
But because they were mega investors they were given special terms and reduced payments. To me that is just another example of big business getting a leg up over normal people.
Its no different to Flo's Cafe down the road going out of business because they cant pay their rates when the Starbucks next door flourishes without paying a penny.
Seems to be a reluctance on here to acknowledge the difference between "wealth" and "a pile of debt" :rotfl: Ah well, maybe Fergy will sell something soon, give the team some hope sort of thing....0 -
ruggedtoast wrote: »
My point of objection about the Wilsons is that Mortgage Express should have foreclosed on them. If it were you or I unable to meet our mortgage payments that is what would have happened to us.
Why? For all their skills in building their empire. Perhaps the Wilsons just required someone to bring a sense of financial order to the situation. Put the business back on a stable footing. The business going under would have cost the UK taxpayer a lot of money.0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »Seems to be a reluctance on here to acknowledge the difference between "wealth" and "a pile of debt" :rotfl: Ah well, maybe Fergy will sell something soon, give the team some hope sort of thing....
You seem to be having a panic attack about a stranger's debt.
Explains a lot.0 -
-
Crashy_Time wrote: »Well I don`t have any debt to worry about myself....... :rotfl:
Is worrying about your mortgage any different to worrying about your rent? Apart from the fact that one is indefinite/perpetual I mean ...If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.0 -
-
Crashy_Time wrote: »I don`t worry about my rent though, and felt sure I had explained that enough times for the resident Doghnuts to comprehend ...:T
Most people on here don't worry about their mortgage, some don't have a mortgage at all and better still, no rent either..... why is it that a doughnut (spelt correctly) such as yourself, can't comprehend that...... :T0 -
Crashy_Time wrote: »I don`t worry about my rent though, and felt sure I had explained that enough times for the resident Doghnuts to comprehend ...:T
So if it's normal to not worry about a monthly payment for somewhere to live what is so bad about having a mortgage? You seem to prefer the idea that a monthly payment for somewhere to live that will never end over a monthly payment for somewhere to live that will end eventually. I can't understand this.If you think of it as 'us' verses 'them', then it's probably your side that are the villains.0 -
So if it's normal to not worry about a monthly payment for somewhere to live what is so bad about having a mortgage? You seem to prefer the idea that a monthly payment for somewhere to live that will never end over a monthly payment for somewhere to live that will end eventually. I can't understand this.
Clearly, Crashy can't understand it either. STILL ! :rotfl:
On side note, 'Let to buy' looks like it could put the cat amoung the renting pigeons.Proudly voted remain. A global union of countries is the only way to commit global capital to the rule of law.0 -
Thrugelmir wrote: »Why? For all their skills in building their empire. Perhaps the Wilsons just required someone to bring a sense of financial order to the situation. Put the business back on a stable footing. The business going under would have cost the UK taxpayer a lot of money.
Why would it have cost the UK taxpayer a lot of money?
It was only Mortgage Express and the Wilson's themselves who were exposed to the Wilson's property empire.
Having to pay housing benefit to the Wilson's for occupancy of Kent homes that had they not been hoovered up by what are by all accounts pretty awful landlords, might actually be starter homes for young families, is costing the tax payer a lot of money.
Unless Fergus Wilson and Judith Wilson are now honorary wards of the State, like the Windsor's or something, I don't think their bankruptcy would especially bother anyone.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.3K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.8K Spending & Discounts
- 244.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.1K Life & Family
- 257.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards