We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The sign of things to come? Amazing!
Comments
-
BTL doesn't reduce the supply of dwellings, second home ownership does."Mrs. Pench, you've won the car contest, would you like a triumph spitfire or 3000 in cash?" He smiled.
Mrs. Pench took the money. "What will you do with it all? Not that it's any of my business," he giggled.
"I think I'll become an alcoholic," said Betty.0 -
-
0
-
wecanhelpu wrote: »And how wise you are for one so young
:rotfl:
What are you on about?!0 -
keeperbear wrote: »Is it now a crime to own two properties? What are you a communist? What next, someone can't own more than one book unless they are authored by Karl Marx? Why do you keep posting such utter tripe?
I'm sorry you missed or decided to ignore the points raised.0 -
Graham_Devon wrote: »I am your generation! I'm 26!
:eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: :eek: Well I must say you remind me of my OH who at 24 is years ahead of his time, fasinating
Cate0 -
Completely unsubstantiated BS!
This article for one goes back as afar as 2003
http://www.bbc.co.uk/pressoffice/pressreleases/stories/2003/10_october/29/money_programme_mortgage.shtml
http://money.guardian.co.uk/homebuying/mortgages/story/0,1456,1073018,00.html
How do you think this monster is being fed.0 -
The problem is that there are too many people chasing too few houses. The answer is to build more houses.
If we are going to build more houses may I suggest building semis with large gardens, two bathrooms and attached garages. There's loads of land available if only the planners cared to free some up. It cannot be right that the population can increase by 10 - 20% but the planners do not allow 10 - 20% more land to be built upon. This policy leads to pokey little homes, flats (or apartments if you prefer) and silly prices.
Holiday homes rob coastal villages of their people and legislation should be brought in to return these homes to housing market.
Buying houses to keep them empty, for whatever reason, is just wrong. This has nothing to do with BTL.
GGThere are 10 types of people in this world. Those who understand binary and those that don't.0 -
Gorgeous_George wrote: »Of course, filling the houses with housing benefit claimants may also be less than desireable.
GG
Why.....................I'm smiling because I have no idea what's going on ...:)
0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 352K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.5K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.2K Spending & Discounts
- 245K Work, Benefits & Business
- 600.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.4K Life & Family
- 258.8K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards