We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
People that park their cars on pavements.....
Comments
-
You can come up with all the excuses in the world, the fact is if someone parks so that it's difficult or not possible for a parent with a pram or a wheelchair user to get past, then they're a pig ignorant git.
If someone is willing to damage cars and not own - then they are a pig ignorant git. It is reckless to not take any reasonable step to avoid damaging property. In some cases it cannot be avoided, in others it propably can.
By the way - a few scratches on the side of the caused by a pedestrian will cause less damage than a few scratches caused by a car if the car was parked further out on the road, so its not actually going to discourage anyone from parking on the pavement.Weight loss challenge, lose 15lb in 6 weeks before Christmas.0 -
I remember driving past a doctors surgery and seeing a queue of mums with buggies waiting to go in. The surgery is on a main road and has the zigzags of a pelican crossing outside. Yet a disabled driver had parked on the pavement and on the zigzags to visit the surgery and the resultant gap was too narrow for pushchairs to pass!The man without a signature.0
-
Nothing in the text you quoted suggests scratching a car.If someone is willing to damage cars and not own - then they are a pig ignorant git. It is reckless to not take any reasonable step to avoid damaging property. In some cases it cannot be avoided, in others it propably can.By the way - a few scratches on the side of the caused by a pedestrian will cause less damage than a few scratches caused by a car if the car was parked further out on the road, so its not actually going to discourage anyone from parking on the pavement.
Quite true, Einstein, but given that when some twàt parks on the pavement you can pretty much guarantee that people are going to pass it and may be tempted to express their dissatisfaction with the citizenship of said twàt, possibly with a key or some similar, sharp, object, but most people manage to park on the road, without ever getting their car damaged. Which rather makes a nonsense of you argument.0 -
How many of the 'anti' brigade, actually drive / own a car?0
-
scheming_gypsy wrote: »How many of the 'anti' brigade, actually drive / own a car?
What on earth has that got to do with anything?
If you see someone smashing the window to a jeweller's shop and stealing the goods, do you need to be a thief to point out that they are doing something they shouldn't.
The whole "are you/do you" thing is just a cheap and desperate tactic used by people who do not have he intelligence to argue a point to try and distract from those who do.
BTW, I do drive a car and would never park on a pavement. I think those who do are reprehensible and would be very pleased to see the action in the rest of the country treated in the same way as it is in London and points awarded to infractors.0 -
scheming_gypsy wrote: »How many of the 'anti' brigade, actually drive / own a car?
Parking or driving on a PUBLIC FOOTPATH is against the law or do you think the law does not apply to you.
i suggest you read these posts
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=63536668&postcount=133
http://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/showpost.php?p=63537019&postcount=134
we are not anti. we are LAW abiding citizens0 -
What on earth has that got to do with anything?
If you see someone smashing the window to a jeweller's shop and stealing the goods, do you need to be a thief to point out that they are doing something they shouldn't.
The whole "are you/do you" thing is just a cheap and desperate tactic used by people who do not have he intelligence to argue a point to try and distract from those who do.
BTW, I do drive a car and would never park on a pavement. I think those who do are reprehensible and would be very pleased to see the action in the rest of the country treated in the same way as it is in London and points awarded to infractors.
I have to agree with you.
For what it's worth although I personally don't drive my husband does so we do have a car but would never park on the pavement.
Lost my soulmate so life is empty.
I can bear pain myself, he said softly, but I couldna bear yours. That would take more strength than I have -
Diana Gabaldon, Outlander0 -
You `sound like an idiot.
it's quite simple. the people who are against it are going over the top with their excuses. Which makes it sound like they don't drive, so i suspect you're lying0 -
scheming_gypsy wrote: »How many of the 'anti' brigade, actually drive / own a car?
Not me. I walk places for the most part. Although when I do learn to drive I will happily walk so that my car is not an inconvenience, as I *am* a parent and know how much of a PITA it is of have to drag my kids in the road.
My husband will be getting a transit in a fortnight though. He too will be parking considerately, especially at home when he'll be parking in a car parking space we have, as he was learning to drive when we moved in so we specifically looked at and favoured houses with parking.
He thinks that people who block pavements are idiots too, and has made his co-worker move his van if it's parked inconveniently.0 -
scheming_gypsy wrote: »You `sound like an idiot.
it's quite simple. the people who are against it are going over the top with their excuses. Which makes it sound like they don't drive, so i suspect you're lying
so the law is an excuse
https://www.gov.uk/waiting-and-parking/parking-239-to-247243
DO NOT stop or park- near a school entrance
- anywhere you would prevent access for Emergency Services
- at or near a bus or tram stop or taxi rank
- on the approach to a level crossing/tramway crossing
- opposite or within 10 metres (32 feet) of a junction, except in an authorised parking space
- near the brow of a hill or hump bridge
- opposite a traffic island or (if this would cause an obstruction) another parked vehicle
- where you would force other traffic to enter a tram lane
- where the kerb has been lowered to help wheelchair users and powered mobility vehicles
- in front of an entrance to a property
- on a bend
- where you would obstruct cyclists’ use of cycle facilities except when forced to do so by stationary traffic.
244
You MUST NOT park partially or wholly on the pavement in London, and should not do so elsewhere unless signs permit it. Parking on the pavement can obstruct and seriously inconvenience pedestrians, people in wheelchairs or with visual impairments and people with prams or pushchairs.
Law GL(GP)A sect 15145
You MUST NOT drive on or over a pavement, footpath or bridleway except to gain lawful access to property, or in the case of an emergency.
Laws HA 1835 sect 72 & RTA 1988 sect 340
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 454.3K Spending & Discounts
- 245.3K Work, Benefits & Business
- 601K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.5K Life & Family
- 259.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards