We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.
This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
The Forum now has a brand new text editor, adding a bunch of handy features to use when creating posts. Read more in our how-to guide
Really bad service from SHOETIQUE
Comments
-
They look a different shape because to me, that is what leather fit flops look like after wear. I know, I have some, they go all soft and floppy.
They would feel different if they'd been tried on, say on the shop floor. As lots of feet would have been in them. One ex demo, one brand new, off they will feel different.
Looking closely at the grain, stitching, and sole, they don't scream fake. They look like a shop floor sample to me, as Jaques said probably the metallic version. If you have one of a shop floor sample pair, it would explain the mixup.
I certainly would not be confident of saying in writing, they are fake and you've been sold fakes. As one it is libellous and two it doesn't look like it. It looks like a shop floor mix up.0 -
tinkerbell, the shape of a shoe does not change no matter how much you wear it.. (the base I mean, not the straps..). And I own another pair of fitflops and now exactly how they feel and how they age, I've had them for some years. So I still believe i was sold a shoe that's not the real thing. Sadly there's no way of proving it, but I've expressed my opinion here, like everyone does.0
-
The thing is if one is normal leather, the other is metallic, the style may vary slightly, yet be similar. As it is two different styles.
You still don't get it do you? Having an opinion is one thing. Saying xxxx has sold me fake shoes. Is libellous, if it is not true, you can't prove it is.
Considering they are an established business and authorised retailer. I wouldn't like to be you when google cache and rank this thread.0 -
[..........]0
-
I also checked with FitFlop and there's no way of proving a pair is fake, they recommend to buy only from approved retailers, as they admit fake shoes are impossible to detect nowadays.0
-
Alisha2008 wrote: »I also checked with FitFlop and there's no way of proving a pair is fake, they recommend to buy only from approved retailers, as they admit fake shoes are impossible to detect nowadays.
Which you did. So I would change your wording. You can't say they are fake, so don't. As when the shoes get back, if shoetique can trace the error and have proof of authenticity. It could potentially backfire on you when the brands they associate with start questioning why their bots are bring up accusations of fakery across the net.0 -
I've changed it, as I said it's my opinion.0
-
It is possible they are just a pair that have been wrongly paired up by the company if they were returned or if they maybe took one foot for a picture. You can get noticable differences in different seasons of the same style so I would say this is likely what has happened. I work for a shoe retailer and odds are a big problem.0
-
Took me far too long to work out how to pronounce "Shoetique"One important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0
-
VictorCharlie wrote: »It is possible they are just a pair that have been wrongly paired up by the company if they were returned or if they maybe took one foot for a picture. You can get noticable differences in different seasons of the same style so I would say this is likely what has happened. I work for a shoe retailer and odds are a big problem.
OFC it is possible, and probably what happened considering they are an authorised retailer. But op has made up her mind, not sure why she posted, I just think she wanted to publicly accuse a company of selling fakes.
Doesn't matter if it your opinion, if you saying they are selling fakes on the net, it is still libel if untrue. Which I suspect it is and there is an innocent explanation.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 354K Banking & Borrowing
- 254.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 455.3K Spending & Discounts
- 247K Work, Benefits & Business
- 603.6K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 178.3K Life & Family
- 261.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.7K Read-Only Boards