Aldi Facebook Page Kicking Off after Parking Eye LBAs

dacouch

Why don't you report Gina Preeky to Trading Standards as it's if it is actually Parking Eye pretending to be a happy customer, then it would be a clear breach of these consumer laws.

"18. A wolf in sheep’s clothing
Falsely claiming or creating the impression that the
trader is not acting for purposes relating to his/her trade,
business, craft or profession, or falsely representing
oneself as a consumer."

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/cpregs/oft979.pdf

Fruitcake

dacouch wrote: »

Why don't you report Gina Preeky to Trading Standards as it's if it is actually Parking Eye pretending to be a happy customer, then it would be a clear breach of these consumer laws.

"18. A wolf in sheep’s clothing
Falsely claiming or creating the impression that the
trader is not acting for purposes relating to his/her trade,
business, craft or profession, or falsely representing
oneself as a consumer."

http://www.oft.gov.uk/shared_oft/business_leaflets/cpregs/oft979.pdf

This wouldn't work unless there was proof positive that Georgina Preeky (as she now calls herself) is an employee of Parkin g aye. (The miss-spiiling is delibriate.)

bod1467

delibriate?

trisontana

We now have Sarah Smith chiming in to support (Geor)gina. Says it all really.

Fruitcake

bod1467 wrote: »

delibriate?

That's how Steve Wright (in the afternoon) pronounces it and he speaks BBC, so it must be correct.

ledsons_teeth

Three more posters protesting about tickets received in the last four hours.

Coupon-mad

Think of all those other victims who are daft and deluded (scared) enough to just pay, every day. Money for old rope for PE.

dacouch

Fruitcake wrote: »

This wouldn't work unless there was proof positive that Georgina Preeky (as she now calls herself) is an employee of Parkin g aye. (The miss-spiiling is delibriate.)

The Trading Standard check the IP addresses

HO87

Fruitcake wrote: »

This wouldn't work unless there was proof positive that Georgina Preeky (as she now calls herself) is an employee of Parkin g aye. (The miss-spiiling is delibriate.)

Correct.

The offence being suggested as fitting the bill is a criminal one and thus the evidence required to secure a conviction would have to "beyond a reasonable doubt". The mere fact that someone's computer was used to post something is not proof that they posted it. To secure a conviction corroborative evidence would be required to put the person at the machine at the time or (perhaps) - as a left field option - evidence to show that it could not have been anyone else i.e. circumstantial evidence. Don't believe anyone who claims that no one has ever been convicted on circumstantial evidence alone.

Browntoa

be interesting if the IP address was at PE's Offices though