Looking to watch the football next season - TV options?

Timalay

Who is your isp? If you are with talktalk, you could upgrade to their youview box and just get the Sports package for £30. That way you wouldn't need a satellite areal, just a standard one.

stefano

davemurgatroyd wrote: »

And virtually all illegal.

Then, would Google be complicit in the illegality of advertising these sites in their searches?

VisionMan

stefano wrote: »

Then, would Google be complicit in the illegality of advertising these sites in their searches?

Don't split hairs please. What you suggested is illegal and you know it is.

in_my_bumble_opinion

You can watch Sky Sports for £5 per month on an ipad with no contract:

https://itunes.apple.com/gb/app/sky-sports-tv/id453417026?mt=8


''Experience every thrilling sporting moment on the move with Sky Sports TV *live* on your iPhone or iPod touch for just £4.99 / €5.99 per calendar month with no lock-in contract.

Enjoy 6 channels of dedicated sports action plus Sky News, meaning that you can pack even more sports into your life and never miss our live coverage of your favourite sports.


Channels include:
- Sky Sports 1, 2, 3 and 4
- Sky Sports F1
- Sky Sports News
- Sky News

PLEASE NOTE: Subscribers will also receive for no extra cost, At The Races until 30th June and ESPN until 31st July, after which time these channels will no longer be available as part of the subscription.

Watch exclusively live coverage of the greatest sporting contests from the UK, Europe and beyond, including:

• Football
Catch live Barclays Premier League, UEFA Champions League, nPower Football League, SPL, International football and much more.

• F1
Sky Sports F1™ is the new home of Formula 1™. Fans can experience the sport like never before on our dedicated F1™ channel, with unprecedented coverage and every race live and uninterrupted.

• Rugby Union
Enjoy live coverage and in-depth analysis of domestic and international rugby union, including games from the Aviva Premiership and Heineken Cup.

• Cricket
Live Test cricket, T20s and ODIs from around the world, plus, exclusive coverage of the domestic season, including the County Championship and Clydesdale Bank 40.......etc,etc''

[Deleted User]

I think this thread ran it's course once the OP called subsidising his parent's viewing "madness"....

Timalay

stefano wrote: »

Then, would Google be complicit in the illegality of advertising these sites in their searches?

You could say that for anything illegal you searched on Google. That really is a daft point to make for you argument.

mije1983

Moneyineptitude wrote: »

I think this thread ran it's course once the OP called subsidising his parent's viewing "madness"....

I was just thinking the exact same thing!

sniggings

Moneyineptitude wrote: »

I think this thread ran it's course once the OP called subsidising his parent's viewing "madness"....

it was a very strange thing to say.

I didn't think him a tight git as he puts it but much worse than that :eek:

davehughes182

Some crazy over reactions on here just becasue OP said he didnt want to subsidise his parents viewing. He didnt come on asking for opinions on his views on life, rather he just wanted moneysaving help like most people on this forum do.
The problem with a lot of people on here is they are so far up their own !!!!!! that they miss the point of alot of posts and jump on the OP for an inocent statement. You dont know his income, you dont know his situation. All you know is he wants cheaper football on the tele. So either provide a solution or assistance or keep your opinions to yourselves.

[Deleted User]

davehughes182 wrote: »

So either provide a solution or assistance or keep your opinions to yourselves.

The very same could be said of your post, which offers no money-saving advice either- just criticism of those who expressed disgust at the OP's attitude to subsidising his parent's TV viewing. You appear to just want to provoke an argument.

In fact, the OP gave a very thorough indication of his outgoings when he said he was already paying £44 for SkyGo on his Xbox and was given several options before his unfortunate response turned everyone against him.

As I said earlier,

I think this thread ran it's course once the OP called subsidising his parent's viewing "madness"....

Does anymore really need to be said?