We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
Debate House Prices
In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Nice people thread part 8 - worth the wait
Comments
-
neverdespairgirl wrote: »Well, you saw my result - I'm the only one who has (thus far) admitted to being other than totaly straight / not capable of definition! But then, I knew that (-:
!
Pretty sure I've discussed my sexuality in the past here. I have not always identified as heterosexual, (though do now) and have not always been in monogamous relationships but have never cheated.0 -
neverdespairgirl wrote: »Well, you saw my result - I'm the only one who has (thus far) admitted to being other than totaly straight / not capable of definition! But then, I knew that (-:
All right, then, I'll come clean.
No reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
I've never cheated, always been monogamous. I've never really "identifed" as anything, though, I've always just been me....much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0
-
neverdespairgirl wrote: »I've never cheated, always been monogamous. I've never really "identifed" as anything, though, I've always just been me.
Sadly, tick boxes rarely have a box marked 'me' when trying to define who 'me' is to others or even oneself.
0 -
I don't want to offend any Berlusconi supporters here, but this excuse made me laugh out loud when I read it:
"Berlusconi was also found guilty of abuse of office by arranging to have Miss El Mahroug, now 19, released from police custody when she was arrested on suspicion of theft.
His defence claimed he believed the dancer was the niece of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak and wanted to avoid a diplomatic incident."
http://uk.news.yahoo.com/silvio-berlusconi-found-guilty-sex-trial-152906400.htmlNo reliance should be placed on the above! Absolutely none, do you hear?0 -
lostinrates wrote: »Sadly, tick boxes rarely have a box marked 'me' when trying to define who 'me' is to others or even oneself.
I agree - but then I don't decide things like that on the basis of box ticking, for me or others. If I don't like a question, or don't like hte possible answers, I just don't answer it.His defence claimed he believed the dancer was the niece of former Egyptian president Hosni Mubarak and wanted to avoid a diplomatic incident."
No-one ever accused the man of being unimaginative!...much enquiry having been made concerning a gentleman, who had quitted a company where Johnson was, and no information being obtained; at last Johnson observed, that 'he did not care to speak ill of any man behind his back, but he believed the gentleman was an attorney'.0 -
Berlusconi does amaze me every time he opens his mouth. How he has any credibility whatsoever is beyond me.
I have been crying my eyes out with laughter at the video accompanying this news article. I just want to know why? And then, will he ever live it down?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10139237/Man-gets-head-trapped-in-traffic-cone.htmlPlease stay safe in the sun and learn the A-E of melanoma: A = asymmetry, B = irregular borders, C= different colours, D= diameter, larger than 6mm, E = evolving, is your mole changing? Most moles are not cancerous, any doubts, please check next time you visit your GP.
0 -
vivatifosi wrote: »I have been crying my eyes out with laughter at the video accompanying this news article. I just want to know why? And then, will he ever live it down?
http://www.telegraph.co.uk/news/uknews/10139237/Man-gets-head-trapped-in-traffic-cone.html
Viva that is hysterical, it made me cry with laughter too.
He seemed very short.0 -
neverdespairgirl wrote: »I agree - but then I don't decide things like that on the basis of box ticking, for me or others. If I don't like a question, or don't like hte possible answers, I just don't answer it.
!
I'm talking about describing not deciding!0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply
Categories
- All Categories
- 351.6K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.6K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.2K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards