Monarch delays & Compensations. Listed flights denied in O.P.

JPears

klint wrote: »

This thread now has more than 3100 posts. It certainly shows the amount of dissatisfaction with Monarch's legal team. However, it also means that it is unrealistic to expect a newbie to read the entire thread.

I think reading the first 300 posts and the last 200 will be sufficient.

lol :cool:

greylib

klint wrote: »

This thread now has more than 3100 posts. It certainly shows the amount of dissatisfaction with Monarch's legal team. However, it also means that it is unrealistic to expect a newbie to read the entire thread.

I think reading the first 300 posts and the last 200 will be sufficient.

I read it all the way through, and then again to make sure I hadn't missed any highlights.

This thread has everything - heroes, villains, triumph, disaster, misery, ecstasy, plus regular cliffhangers ... it should be turned into a TV programme. Well done, everybody :T:T:T

Vauban

It's definitely my favourite thread of the lot: and I look forward to writing the next exciting installment next Tuesday, as my own case finally comes to a head.

As the continuity announcer might say, "Will it be Vauban Vanquished or Vauban Victorious? Tune in next week ..."

klint

Vauban wrote: »

It's definitely my favourite thread of the lot: and I look forward to writing the next exciting installment next Tuesday, as my own case finally comes to a head.

As the continuity announcer might say, "Will it be Vauban Vanquished or Vauban Victorious? Tune in next week ..."

lol
Good luck!

statictom

Vauban wrote: »

It's definitely my favourite thread of the lot: and I look forward to writing the next exciting installment next Tuesday, as my own case finally comes to a head.

As the continuity announcer might say, "Will it be Vauban Vanquished or Vauban Victorious? Tune in next week ..."

Best of luck on the day - not that you will need it.

David_e

Vauban wrote: »

It's definitely my favourite thread of the lot: and I look forward to writing the next exciting installment next Tuesday, as my own case finally comes to a head.

Very best of luck!

derby4ever

Vauban wrote: »

It's definitely my favourite thread of the lot: and I look forward to writing the next exciting installment next Tuesday, as my own case finally comes to a head.

As the continuity announcer might say, "Will it be Vauban Vanquished or Vauban Victorious? Tune in next week ..."

Best of luck Vauban I am in court week after so lets hope its an expensive time for Monarch.
Had quick look through last posts and seen no mention of recent court success in Macclesfield court sept 2013 against Easyjet regarding Easyjet defence using a knock on which was thrown out by court in favour of claimant.I will be quoting this case and suggest others do to

Poundzhound

Vauban wrote: »

"..Vauban Victorious? Tune in next week ..."

You'll be doing :dance:after a few of these :beer:
Go get 'em Vauban!!

Issuma

And another rejection letter for my claim !!!!

Thank you for your further correspondence.

We do understand your disappointment by the outcome of your claim. We can assure you that your claim was thoroughly investigated in line with the applicable legalisation. However, as the European Commission’s (EC) have now issued guidelines regarding extraordinary circumstances we have reviewed your claim again in line with these.

For your reference the fault which occurred was not caused by a failure to maintain the aircraft. The component which failed is considered ‘on condition’ which refers to parts which should not require unscheduled maintenance or replacement during normal operational service. When parts such as this fail during normal operation when maintained in accordance with the relevant maintenance programme this is an unpredictable event.

In direct reference to the recently released EC guidelines regarding extraordinary circumstances you will note that failure of on-condition monitored parts when they have been correctly maintained in addition to any technical defect which becomes apparent immediately prior to departure or in-flight which require investigation and/or repair before the aircraft is airworthy for the intended flight are considered an extraordinary circumstance.

Following this review we are satisfied that our initial assessment of your claim was correct and delay compensation will not be paid.

For your information please find attached the link for the EC guidelines we have referred to.

111KAB

Issuma - off to court I'm afraid - as Monarch say these are EU 'guidelines' - not law. The law is Wallentin which is on your side.