TripAdvisor account disabled

rustyboy21

A lot of people have been saying for quite a while now that Schofield is getting too big for his boots and thinks he is the best thing on TV. You can see how his fame has gone right to his head by the twitter posts he makes. He thinks he knows about everything when he obviously doesn't.

IMO he got totally owned by DC, holly didn't fair much better. It was a stunt, which he thought would make him Big, it did the opposite, it made him out to be a tosspot.

Schofield, Go back to having your hand up a gophers ar5e in a small room. Best place for you !

pedro123456

I take it there aint many Phillip Schofield fans in here then.

Not to worry, like him or loath him he said what the vast majority of people wanted to say............."lets have action against the child abusers",surely we are on common ground there?

And yes I accept some people would rather him not have presented a list, but he has, and he cant turn the clock back to suit the minority

I dont think he intentionally showed the list to the camera either, have names been published from this list, or has anyone complained they were on the list?

rustyboy who's a lot of people?

Pollycat

So your Tripadvisor account was disabled because you posted this:

pedro123456 wrote: »

PHILLIP SCHOFIELD FOR PRIME MINISTER !!!!

pedro123456 wrote: »

Whats wrong with that, not holiday related i'll grant you , but its a bit harsh to disable my account for.

You know what's wrong with it, you've already said it - it's not travel related.

pedro123456 wrote: »

Think I'm going to write to the press

Write to the press?
What on earth about?

I agree with Meer53:

meer53 wrote: »

Pedro you sound like a numpty to me.

Make comments, fair enough, but use the right website.

You really are a numpty!
Firstly for posting something so off-topic (not to mention pretty controversial) on a travel websitte and secondly for posting this on the MSE Praise Vent & Warnings board.

I'm not even going to comment on what my opinions are about Philip Schofield and what he did as I don't think it's got anything to do with the original post.

gregg1

pedro123456 wrote: »

I take it there aint many Phillip Schofield fans in here then.

Not to worry, like him or loath him he said what the vast majority of people wanted to say............."lets have action against the child abusers",surely we are on common ground there?

And yes I accept some people would rather him not have presented a list, but he has, and he cant turn the clock back to suit the minority

I dont think he intentionally showed the list to the camera either, have names been published from this list, or has anyone complained they were on the list?

rustyboy who's a lot of people?

Of course it was deliberate. Schofield is so far up his own backside he thinks it is OK to act as judge and jury. He certainly did not speak for me, I prefer to assume someone is innocent until proven guilty by the correct process, not by conducting a witch hunt. That is the problem with Schofield. He has set himself up as the spokesperson for the masses when all I see is an attention seeking egotistical prat.

The names on that list are now on the internet forever. Deservedly so IF they are guilty. Outrageous if they are innocent. And you are being naive if you think the majority of people would condone that!

You are right on one thing, the clock can't be turned back. However, Schofield should be sacked for his actions.

pedro123456

Pollycat, please read my post in its entirety, I said it wasn't travel related but I thought the disabling of my account was extreme, there are hundreds of posts on TA that are not travel related.
- Ive wrote to the press to support Phillip Schofield, not to complain about TA for goodness sake !!!!
-And yes I agree people have gone off the original post , thank you for your contribution to the original post, however personal comments about me from you/Meer53 are not acceptable, and uncalled for.

Furthermore this is a "vent" board, and my vent was with TA, it so happens in doing so my thread has gone towards a praise view of Phillip Schoffield, how strange eh?

gregg1

pedro123456 wrote: »

Pollycat, please read my post in its entirety, I said it wasn't travel related but I thought the disabling of my account was extreme, there are hundreds of posts on TA that are not travel related.
- Ive wrote to the press to support Phillip Schofield, not to complain about TA for goodness sake !!!!
-And yes I agree people have gone off the original post , thank you for your contribution to the original post, however personal comments about me from you/Meer53 are not acceptable, and uncalled for.

Furthermore this is a "vent" board, and my vent was with TA, it so happens in doing so my thread has gone towards a praise view of Phillip Schoffield, how strange eh?

"A praise view of Phillip Schofield"?!!!

Really? Is that what you are seeing here?:rotfl:

pedro123456

I think you have got the wrong end of the stick gregg, it was MY vent that turned into MY praise, get it? :doh:

antrobus

pedro123456 wrote: »

..... have names been published from this list, or has anyone complained they were on the list?..

Yup. One of 'em says there are taking legal action against This Morning, as well as "all media" who have defamed his reputation.

Do you want to be next?

pmduk

pedro123456 wrote: »

Who's been named?

My first reaction was to tell people not to answer that. But, on reflection. please do, it'll get this idiotic thread deleted in a nanosecond.

pedro123456

Quite right pmduk.........message removed, pardon me for asking "who" although I thought if he/she knew about legal action it would be common knowledge. And you dont HAVE to look at the thread if it displeases you !!!

Anyway glad I swerved your nanosecond.....phewww

should I answer the "do you want to next" part of the post?