We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

Debate House Prices


In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non MoneySaving matters are no longer permitted. This includes wider debates about general house prices, the economy and politics. As a result, we have taken the decision to keep this board permanently closed, but it remains viewable for users who may find some useful information in it. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

State workers still enjoy advantage over private employees

11314161819

Comments

  • I agree with the social workers - however those scientists arnt public sector. the government itself does no research. I may be wrong on the last point, but I though the forensic people were privately contracted as well - not public sector.

    It may not be the same for all police forces. But from what I understand many people in SOCO are civillian workers working for the police. But the labs that do the real scientific work are private companies.
  • Of course they are but they aren't equivalent jobs. Since I have been approached by big 4 accountancy firms, magic circle law firms and investment banks all specifically trying to hire forensic accountants with litigation experience, I know what my exact role pays in the private sector and it's significantly less.

    Well if that is true, then your job is an exception to the rule.

    I would keep quiet about it if I were you, otherwise you could be subject to the next round of public sector cuts. ;)
  • Andy_L wrote: »
    Forensics are on the verge of being contracted out/privitised

    And there are going to be many cut backs. A friend of mine is losing her job in forensics.
  • chewmylegoff
    chewmylegoff Posts: 11,469 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    Well if that is true, then your job is an exception to the rule.

    I would keep quiet about it if I were you, otherwise you could be subject to the next round of public sector cuts. ;)

    a rule without any supporting evidence, a bit like the meme that is developing that average public sector pay is higher than private sector pay due to the higher concentration of "highly skilled professionals" in the public sector, never seen any numbers to back that up, just a bit of rhetoric about bin collection being privatised.

    i don't think higher public sector pay is confined to my job in isolation. there are other roles within my organisation where pay is higher here, and in my experience (which includes auditing the payrolls of probably 100 different SMEs during the period when I trained, and line managing staff in the public sector) e.g. general admin roles seem to be better paid in the public sector than in the private.
  • Andy_L
    Andy_L Posts: 13,080 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    a rule without any supporting evidence, a bit like the meme that is developing that average public sector pay is higher than private sector pay due to the higher concentration of "highly skilled professionals" in the public sector, never seen any numbers to back that up, just a bit of rhetoric about bin collection being privatised.

    Really? I'm sure I've provided links to it in the past on these sort of threads, here they are again

    http://www.ons.gov.uk/ons/rel/lmac/public-and-private-sector-earnings/2011/rep-public-and-private-sector-earnings.html

    http://www.incomesdata.co.uk/areas-of-expertise/pay-reward/private-public-sector-earnings.pdf
  • I'm surprised that this pointless thread has gone on for so long. Having worked in the public sector in the past I would say that there have been times when the private sector offered the best pay packages and, more recently, the public sector edged ahead, mostly because of the demise of final salary pensions in the private sector. Now the private sector is beginning to look more attractive, largely as a result of the government changes to pensions and the public sector pay freeze.

    What I'm more concerned about is certain privileged occupations that use the public sector as a cash cow - eg. doctors. This needs to change.
  • a rule without any supporting evidence, a bit like the meme that is developing that average public sector pay is higher than private sector pay due to the higher concentration of "highly skilled professionals" in the public sector, never seen any numbers to back that up, just a bit of rhetoric about bin collection being privatised.

    i don't think higher public sector pay is confined to my job in isolation. there are other roles within my organisation where pay is higher here, and in my experience (which includes auditing the payrolls of probably 100 different SMEs during the period when I trained, and line managing staff in the public sector) e.g. general admin roles seem to be better paid in the public sector than in the private.

    I'm sorry, but I would have thought that an accountant would have the intelligence to work this one out.

    People have told you on here that the equivalent to their job in the private sector is higher paid. Yet you are just going by what you are paid.

    General admin jobs in the public sector are very low paid when you do a direct comparrison with job role and responsibility.

    Most of the low paid jobs in the public sector have now been contracted out. So in most public sector premises you will find that cooks and cleaners, as well as many other jobs are now done by private contractors. In fact in many local authorities payroll and pensions have also been contracted out. In fact the list can go on and on, including refuse collection, housing, and in fact G4S also supply many hospital staff.

    So like I said, your days of high pay are probably numbered.
  • Andy_L wrote: »

    Yes, but he chooses to ignore those.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    And rightly so.

    Why should the tax payer pay people to spend all day on social networking sites?

    The fact is they do not, most parts of government are so concerned about information assurance that they block access to such sites. My neighbour works for the Government and he told me their firewall even blocks some other government departments as being unsafe.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
  • BobQ
    BobQ Posts: 11,181 Forumite
    Ninth Anniversary 10,000 Posts Name Dropper Combo Breaker
    edited 14 September 2012 at 9:49PM
    Quote:
    Originally Posted by paulmapp8306 viewpost.gif
    I agree with the social workers - however those scientists arnt public sector. the government itself does no research. I may be wrong on the last point, but I though the forensic people were privately contracted as well - not public sector.


    Andy_L wrote: »
    You are mistaken
    https://www.dstl.gov.uk/supporttooperations

    "Dstl scientists and analysts are directly deployed on operations to provide direct support to commanders. During 2011 around 18 scientists were deployed on operations at any one time"

    Forensics are on the verge of being contracted out/privitised

    Thank you AndyL, for demonstrating that paulmapp8306 does indeed not know what he is talking about.

    There are quite a few more government scientists on Salisbury Plain (read the corporate plan on the same site). The Met Office, British Antarctic Survey, Health Protection Agency, Hydrographic Office all employ government scientists. The Forensic Science Service is now closed but there are forensic scientists directly employed by other government laboratories.
    Few people are capable of expressing with equanimity opinions which differ from the prejudices of their social environment. Most people are incapable of forming such opinions.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.6K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 600.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.5K Life & Family
  • 259K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.