duty to get highest pricee for repossession??

j_carnee

ILW wrote: »

How do the bank know that, what come back have they got if you do not and drop them in it?

money laundering regulations fully complied with....not an issue here.the 3rd party solicitors representing bank say they will not deal with self conveyancers....despite fact self conveyancing is allowed in this country.....

j_carnee

picklepick wrote: »

No. I don't know you. That's the point.

can you give a legal reason why any ordinary person cannot legally complete within 24 hours.....dont need to know me to answer this.

antrobus

j_carnee wrote: »

can fully comply with m.l. regulations

You don't have to comply with money laundering regs. The bank does however. If the bank was dealing with a solicitor it could proceed on the basis that the solicitor has already checked you out. In order to deal with you direct the bank might therefore be obliged to check you out themselves.

j_carnee

G_M wrote: »

Oh for goodness sake! Is this thread still going?

Look jc, you asked a question, you got a load of people answering. Pretty well all of them saying the same thing (with variations on the reason).

But it's not what you wanted to hear.

OK - ignore everyone here and take it up with the bank. Or the repossesee.

But arguing your point here and repeating the unprovable claims that you "know what you're doing"; "can Complete in 24 hours"; "have done it 6 times before"; "don't need insurance" etc gets no one anywhere.

This thread should die.

apart from closed-shop solicitors defending their position.......
nobody answered questions posed......

if we're all anti-self conveyancing and agree bank has no duty to take best price......i agree thread should go.

RabbitMad

j_carnee wrote: »

money laundering regulations fully complied with....not an issue here.the 3rd party solicitors representing bank say they will not deal with self conveyancers....despite fact self conveyancing is allowed in this country.....

There you have it - they have stipulated a requirement for any offer and you can either accept that or not buy.

My local Tesco's has a no hoodie policy, but there is nothing illegal about wearing a hoodie so does that mean Tesco is failing in its duty to the owners? No.

If the property means so much to you instruct a solicitor and resubmit your offer (minus solicitor costs).

Thrugelmir

j_carnee wrote: »

the 3rd party solicitors representing bank say they will not deal with self conveyancers.

Suggest you seek clarification of this point directly from the banks solicitors.

j_carnee

antrobus wrote: »

You don't have to comply with money laundering regs. The bank does however. If the bank was dealing with a solicitor it could proceed on the basis that the solicitor has already checked you out. In order to deal with you direct the bank might therefore be obliged to check you out themselves.

a passport,utility bill etc are really hard to produce......

j_carnee

Thrugelmir wrote: »

Suggest you seek clarification of this point directly from the banks solicitors.

estate agents will not give me details of bank selling or their solicitors.....
i would love to talk to bank!!

ILW

Cannot understand why you do not just offer £500 quid less and appoint a solicitor.

j_carnee

ILW wrote: »

Cannot understand why you do not just offer £500 quid less and appoint a solicitor.[/QUOTE
of course i could.....but does not answer questions....should they be allowed deny self conveyancing/should bank be made take best price(reducing debt of owner)