County Court papers

muckybutt

http://www.direct.gov.uk/en/MoneyTaxAndBenefits/ManagingDebt/Respondingtoacourtclaimformoney/DG_195867

From above site :

Paying your county court judgment

The judgment form will tell you how to pay. You’ll usually pay the person you owe or their solicitor, not the court.
Make sure you can prove that you’ve paid - send cheques or make a bank transfer and don’t send cash through the post. Keep a record of your payments and pay well in time.

Trebor16

MSE_Andrea wrote: »

Hi

So you don't potentially scare genuine newbies away please reply as though they are genuine and report any suspicions to the Forum Team to investigate.

Thank you

https://forums.moneysavingexpert.com/discussion/3991161

Oh dear, are we entering a new era of close supervision for having the audacity to question the mods about their actions? Or is this a coincidental one off?

WageSlave1_2

Rosie1965 wrote: »

Esmerobbo, thank you. I will prob just pay it now. Still not sure whether it is from the court or not cos it says make payment to the solicitor and specifically asks not to send payment to the court.

Entirely up to you, of course. But it'll just cost a stamp to see if Trethowans will sign up to the consent order setting aside the judgment and knocking out their entire claim. If they say 'Yes' (and you'll be letting them know that you are aware of the Perera case) then it will be just the £45 you'll be paying to file the consent order.

If they say 'no' then you can pay it (assuming you don't want to go ahead and make the set aside/strike out application). Does that make sense?

esmerobbo

WageSlave1 wrote: »

Entirely up to you, of course. But it'll just cost a stamp to see if Trethowans will sign up to the consent order setting aside the judgment and knocking out their entire claim. If they say 'Yes' (and you'll be letting them know that you are aware of the Perera case) then it will be just the £45 you'll be paying to file the consent order.

If they say 'no' then you can pay it (assuming you don't want to go ahead and make the set aside/strike out application). Does that make sense?

Its worth a try I suppose, however they have won two Aintree claims since then!
Tis a pity all judges aren't as clued up as the one who heard Perera!

Trebor16

esmerobbo wrote: »

Its worth a try I suppose, however they have won two Aintree claims since then!
Tis a pity all judges aren't as clued up as the one who heard Perera!

Any info on the two Aintree cases they won?

AlexisV

I understand one of those was because the defendant forgot to turn up!

Not kidding.

Don't know about the other one.

esmerobbo

Trebor16 wrote: »

Any info on the two Aintree cases they won?

Here's one http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?318783-Court-papers-from-Trethowans&highlight=fedup74

They also got a default against the same person which was set aside OP never let me know the outcome of the set aside.



Will try and find the other.

Trebor16

esmerobbo wrote: »

Here's one http://www.consumeractiongroup.co.uk/forum/showthread.php?318783-Court-papers-from-Trethowans&highlight=fedup74

They also got a default against the same person which was set aside OP never let me know the outcome of the set aside.



Will try and find the other.

Seems the judge wasn't very clued up to have accepted that the running costs of the car park amounted to losses.

esmerobbo

I think the Solicitor was though she travelled from Southampton as their "Agents" had lost the last few.
She had all sorts of costs listed, and suckered the DJ into accepting it.