Fined £275 for watching YOUTUBE

[Deleted User]

bazster wrote: »

in which case you are making a whole lot of fuss over nothing.

I wouldn't call 21 years of threats and intimidation "nothing".

ColinFishwick

The Safordian you didnt answer it all you said was


"Well the BBC don't seem to think so because I've been under investigation for over 21yrs now and their TV detector equipment would know

I take it you are another one who demand everyone should fund the BBC because you happen to like it?"


A simple yes or no would suffice not what BBC think or that you somehow think I am all for BBC mealy because I asked question which twice you refuse to answer

bazster

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

Based on that, you too could join the ranks on the LLF.

Of course, you would become a target for accusatory and threatening letters, visits, etc.

Or maybe you're just paranoid. I didn't have a TV for many years: every now and then someone with a clipboard would knock on the door to ask why I didn't have a TV licence, and when I explained that I didn't have a TV he/she would invariably thank me and toddle off, happy as Larry. No accusations, no threats, no harassment - but then again, I wasn't looking for a fight with them.

bazster

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

I wouldn't call 26 years of threats and intimidation "nothing".

Nor would I. If I believed it.

[Deleted User]

bazster wrote: »

Or maybe you're just paranoid.

Or maybe I'm speaking from personal experience.

[Deleted User]

bazster wrote: »

Nor would I. If I believed it.

Are you claiming he's lying?

If so, do you have any evidence to support that claim?

ColinFishwick

The Safordian you have far too much time on your hands to vent such Anti BBC. Why dont you use your energy to some use by changing things if you feel so strong. Your argument about 1930's and SS is laughable at best when you put it to your anti BBC agenda. There is absolutely no comparison

Its not worth arguing with you clearly you have a chip and a very big one at that. You could argue with yourself in room, so I shall bow out of this, cant be bothered with it.

I must also work for BBC

The_Safordian

bazster wrote: »

Nor would I. If I believed it.

They do it everyday to millions of people. Last year they sent out 85 million threatograms

http://www.thesun.co.uk/sol/homepage/news/4172233/BBC-blows-13m-on-TV-licence-threat-letters.html

This guy had to take them to a High Court just so they'd leave him alone

http://www.tvlicenceresistance.info/forum/index.php/topic,5093.0.html

But you keep doing the BBC's PR

The_Safordian

ColinFishwick wrote: »

The Safordian you have far too much time on your hands to vent such Anti BBC

So do certain other indaviuals but the strange thing is why do they object so much about anything negative about the BBC being heard

ColinFishwick wrote: »

. Why dont you use your energy to some use by changing things if you feel so strong.

I could say the same to you. Please alert us if someone is forcing you to post on this thread.

ColinFishwick wrote: »

Your argument about 1930's and SS is laughable at best when you put it to your anti BBC agenda. There is absolutely no comparison

No you are just saying that because you do not wish the comparisons to be linked.

Can you imagine someone banging on your front door demanding you fund a newspaper via a newspaper licence and yet this is happening with the BBC.

ColinFishwick wrote: »

Its not worth arguing with you clearly you have a chip and a very big one at that. You could argue with yourself in room, so I shall bow out of this, cant be bothered with it.

If its not worth it why spend so much time on the subject?

bazster

Bedsit_Bob wrote: »

Are you claiming he's lying?

If so, do you have any evidence to support that claim?

What are you, his Dad?