We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Cash ISAs: The Best Currently Available List
Options
Comments
-
Sounds like her position could be similar to Dereks in the case studies:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/293747/Fact_sheet_template_-_10__tax_9.pdf
(it refers to a £10500 personal allowance, but that has been increased to £10600 since)0 -
AlwaysLearnin wrote: »Sounds like her position could be similar to Dereks in the case studies:
https://www.gov.uk/government/uploads/system/uploads/attachment_data/file/293747/Fact_sheet_template_-_10__tax_9.pdf
(it refers to a £10500 personal allowance, but that has been increased to £10600 since)
Well done finding that which clearly explains it is better to use a higher paying savings/current account rather than an ISA if your total income is less than £15600 in the next tax year. This must benefit many pensioners providing they understand you have to apply for it using form R850 -
Well done finding that which clearly explains it is better to use a higher paying savings/current account rather than an ISA if your total income is less than £15600 in the next tax year. This must benefit many pensioners providing they understand you have to apply for it using form R850
-
They sound grand rates but can be beaten in various other scenarios
- 12 x£1,270 in 3.5% ISA = £287.41 return
- 12 x £800 in 6% non ISA RS, £400 in 4% non ISA RS: £330.61 return after BR tax (£442.60 gross)
- 1 x £15,240 in 2% ISA = £304.80 return
- 1 x £15,240 in 3% non-ISA accounts £365.56 return after BR tax (£457.20 gross)
- 1 x £4,500 in 5% non-ISA, £5,000 in 4% non-ISA, £5,740 in 3% non-ISA: £474.72 return after BR tax (£593.40 gross)
- etc etc etc
Worth for people to work out what is best for them, and not just look at AER numbers.
You're right to point out the effective halving of the rate for a RS but I think your figures omit the positive effect of earning non-Isa interest on the unsaved portions of the regular saver accounts before they get put into an isa.
Sant123 feeder into saffron isa is a powerful combination0 -
OK, can you work out the extra (for all the regular savers, not just the ISAs)?
I would put it to you that drip-feeding still leaves cash ISAs as sub-optimal deals for most people.0 -
Sure. Anyone can get 1.5% easy access which is worth approx 110 extra (using a simplistic slightly inaccurate calculation) before tax.
For a 123 account this doubles to become about 200 extra before tax but after deducting the 123 fee.
For the isa, this beats all but the complicated arrangement of 3, 4, 5 % accounts for non and basic rate tax. For higher rate tax i believe it beats all others.0 -
For the isa, this beats all but the complicated arrangement of 3, 4, 5 % accounts for non and basic rate tax. For higher rate tax i believe it beats all others.0
-
I agree that the non isa 6% regular savers would yield a higher return for basic or higher rate tax payers, if you are sure you will not need the instant penalty free access that the saffron is likely to offer.
I disagree this may be tax free. The budget changes are clearly scheduled for the next but one tax year.0 -
Ah, hadn't realised that. Most of my regular savers have either had interest paid monthly or either in December or at the end of the tax year.
I understand your point though because i do have one rs maturing which will not pay out until next tax year.
Good point to consider.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards