Utility Warehouse (Telecom Plus) Discussion

vinnyph

Quentin wrote: »

How can it be a "false claim" that uw reps are taught to diss the switching sites when we can see the ex policeman uw rep showing the reps how to do it in the uw training video!

And reproducing ASA adjudications is a strange thing for the uw to do here. Would you like all the ASA adjudications against uw for misleading advertising to be reproduced?

You have to admit it is a false claim just like your claim for a UW beating cashback card. Have you found a link to that yet. Why you don't apologise when you are wrong I don't know.

That video was recorded many years ago. At the time UW had been the cheapest tariff in country for approximately 5 years prior to that based on a month by month comparison. You have a habit of quoting something to try deface UW without looking into the full details.

jimexbox

1carminestocky wrote: »

What possible problem could there be in posting your current usage figs (except the fact you'd clearly forgeotten what you posted just a couple of months ago and it's all blown up in your face somewhat :rotfl:)

Carmine, do you ever read my posts?

How many times do I need to repeat myself? My circumstances have changed therefore my projected energy usage has change. Can even you grasp this principle?

vinnyph

Its probably more likely that Jimexbox put arbitrary usage figures into the price comparison site and forgot what he entered in. It would be interesting to know the usage figures he entered. As to exactly why he won't give the usage figures we can only speculate.

jimexbox

vinnyph wrote: »

Its probably more likely that Jimexbox put arbitrary usage figures into the price comparison site and forgot what he entered in. It would be interesting to know the usage figures he entered. As to exactly why he won't give the usage figures we can only speculate.

That's exactly why its pointless giving you any usage figures. Your 'modus operandi' to anything you disagree with is to accuse the person of lying. Im not bothered if you believe my figures or not, what is indisputable is that UW are vastly more expensive than my current tarrif.

Ive even given you screen shots. Whats your next form of attack? Accuse me of tampering with the pictures?:rolleyes:

Quentin

vinnyph wrote: »

That video was recorded many years ago. At the time UW had been the cheapest tariff in country for approximately 5 years prior to that ......

UW has never been "the cheapest tariff in the country"! Though no doubt that claim has been made in various forms by unscroupulous reps! And were that true, what a slide they have had to become one of the most expensive tariffs now!

Now you say the training video was recorded "many" years ago - what is the relevance of how old it is to the training methods being demonstrated?

If you are ashamed by it, then why is it so prominent not only on the uw reps training site, but on you tube as well?

vinnyph

Quentin wrote: »

UW has never been "the cheapest tariff in the country"! Though no doubt that claim has been made in various forms by unscroupulous reps! And were that true, what a slide they have had to become one of the most expensive tariffs now!

Now you say the training video was recorded "many" years ago - what is the relevance of how old it is to the training methods being demonstrated?

Are you stating one of your 'facts' again Quentin. You have been digging at UW for 3 years. Do you know anything about it prior to that. You should try to prove your statement really.

Have you proved that UW beating cashback card yet?

1carminestocky

jimexbox wrote: »

Please click on the thumbnail, UW are even more expensive than I thought. I haven't copyrighted this material, so any reps who wish to print it out for their pitch, feel free.;)

LOL. And STILL no usage figures. Or region.

PS Why don't you migrate to EDF? They're cheaper. Is it the cancellation of discount on your departing Eon bill that's preventing you? And were you made aware of this particular T&C when you originally signed up with them? :rolleyes:

1carminestocky

vinnyph wrote: »

When I work out the actual annual price for UW I usually find they are less than the annual prices quoted on price comparison sites for UW. It would be interesting to find how much less your actual prices with UW would be. A few years ago I did a calculation and the difference was more than £200 out.

To be able to do that you would need jimexbox's usage figs, I guess. And they appear to be more of a secret than the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden The question is why he's so reticent to provide them.

jimexbox

1carminestocky wrote: »

LOL. And STILL no usage figures. Or region.

PS Why don't you migrate to EDF? They're cheaper. Is it the cancellation of discount on your departing Eon bill that's preventing you? And were you made aware of this particular T&C when you originally signed up with them? :rolleyes:

I could send you a T-shirt with the energyhelpline pages on. You seem to jump to conclusion to conclusion without waiting for an answer. There is no cancellation fee, but if you took the time to observe the cheapest tariffs, as opposed to your expensive one. You would realise that the 'big 6' tend to trade top spot on a regular basis. Whereas UW regularly scrape round at the bottom.

You haven't given me your quote on what you think of the triple guarantee yet. I would honestly like to know what you think. If your true opinion conflicts with your position of shareholder, I will understand.

jimexbox

1carminestocky wrote: »

To be able to do that you would need jimexbox's usage figs, I guess. And they appear to be more of a secret than the whereabouts of Osama Bin Laden The question is why he's so reticent to provide them.

Please click on the thumbnail.........