We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Carrington Carr Home Finance in administration
Options
Comments
-
magpiecottage wrote: »Sorry - didn't spot this.
Anything to do with mortgages (including MPPI) from 2/11/04 go to Legal & General.
Prior to that you are sunk, I'm afraid.
Hi Magpie
I was sold a lump sum MPPI by Carrington Carr as part of a re-mortgage package in 2004 but for me the really terrifying bit is that the discussions and home visits took place in October and the MPPI policy is dated 3 November 2004. So, my question is which side do I fall?
Thanks for any useful advice you can give."I have enough money to last me the rest of my life, unless I buy something"0 -
It is the date you signed the application that matters. Not the date it went into force.
Was it an L&G policy you were sold?I am an Independent Financial Adviser (IFA). The comments I make are just my opinion and are for discussion purposes only. They are not financial advice and you should not treat them as such. If you feel an area discussed may be relevant to you, then please seek advice from an Independent Financial Adviser local to you.0 -
Typically, MPPI is applied for with the mortgage and takes some time to go into force - so I think you are probably out of luck.0
-
It is the date you signed the application that matters. Not the date it went into force.
Was it an L&G policy you were sold?
No, it was a D&D Homecare policy. It says they are members of the GISC on the policy document."I have enough money to last me the rest of my life, unless I buy something"0 -
That will not help you unless AWD did not subscribe to the GISC code
If they did then D&D has done nothing wrong. If did not then D&D breached the code by accepting the business and you have a valid complaint about the PPI.0 -
magpiecottage wrote: »That will not help you unless AWD did not subscribe to the GISC code
If they did then D&D has done nothing wrong. If did not then D&D breached the code by accepting the business and you have a valid complaint about the PPI.
Thanks Magpie.
So, this is quite important to me then as it seems I won't be able to make a claim for mis-sold PPI against AWD/Carrington Carr under the FSA rules as I probably signed the application form prior to 2 November 2004 (the date they became FSA registered).
I wonder how I go about finding out if AWD/Carrington Carr subscribed to the GISC code in Sep/Oct 2004?"I have enough money to last me the rest of my life, unless I buy something"0 -
So...
Please just confirm, a mortgage and life insurance and PPI arranged in Dec 2001 cant be claimed as mis sold as they werent FSA regulated?:silenced:0 -
lemonade_lifestyle wrote: »So...
Please just confirm, a mortgage and life insurance and PPI arranged in Dec 2001 cant be claimed as mis sold as they werent FSA regulated?
Not quite. It is FOS jurisdiction that counts.
AWD/Carrington Carr never had FOS jurisdiction in its own name.0 -
We seem to be in the same situation as everyone else, Recieved a letter from Martin Kaye solicitors back in April, but I have'nt actually done anything about it, I would just like to know if I should write a letter to Legal and General or do I need to send the form that I have already downloaded from this site. We also took our the mortgage protection in 2007,which we have always had because of my husbands job, but we were'nt very happy about paying it all up front,but were advised that it would be cheaper to do this.but we realise now that they must have made a fortune out of everyone who they done this to, and we are going to try and get it sorted ourselves, rather than paying someone who could possibly take half. Thankyou.0
-
Yes - complain to L&G.
If they also told you to pay a fee to cover future mortgage advice complain about that too - do not accept an undertaking from L&G to provide the advice, arguing that if it had been explained that the extra fee could instead have allowed you to borrow less and avoid interest costs you would have chosen to do that.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards