📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Wear Glasses ? Driver ?

Options
13

Comments

  • mgdavid
    mgdavid Posts: 6,710 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Name Dropper
    Trebor16 wrote: »
    What makes you think the officer was telling lies? They may have believed it was the case to have spare glasses and told the OP in good faith but to suggest they lied is OTT.

    Ignorance of the law is no excuse - and applies to the police as well as us, therefore they lied.
    The questions that get the best answers are the questions that give most detail....
  • Trebor16
    Trebor16 Posts: 3,061 Forumite
    mgdavid wrote: »
    Ignorance of the law is no excuse - and applies to the police as well as us, therefore they lied.

    What a stupid comment. Ignorance is one thing, but to say it is deliberate lies because they didn't know that aspect of law is absurd.
    "You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"


    John539 2-12-14 Post 15030
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    Trebor16 wrote: »
    What a stupid comment. Ignorance is one thing, but to say it is deliberate lies because they didn't know that aspect of law is absurd.

    It's probably worse if a copper doesn't have any knowledge of the law.
    I think I'd prefer it if they were trying it on, rather than handing out fines for offences they thought existed.
  • triticale
    triticale Posts: 771 Forumite
    Not sure which is the most worrying scenario - the copper making an incorrect claim despite being ignorant of the law, or the copper blatently lying...

    but then watch a few episodes of one of those 'police camera action' programmes and you'll see much bullsh*t being spouted.
  • Gloomendoom
    Gloomendoom Posts: 16,551 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Combo Breaker
    mgdavid wrote: »
    Ignorance of the law is no excuse - and applies to the police as well as us, therefore they lied.

    What a load of nonsense. A lie is a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive. It is not a statement made based on ignorance of the true facts.
  • mikey72
    mikey72 Posts: 14,680 Forumite
    What a load of nonsense. A lie is a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive. It is not a statement made based on ignorance of the true facts.

    If a copper really is that ignnorant, hopefully they'll assign him to school crossings, or just sack him for being an idiot.
  • Trebor16
    Trebor16 Posts: 3,061 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    If a copper really is that ignnorant, hopefully they'll assign him to school crossings, or just sack him for being an idiot.

    So he gets one thing wrong and you want him sacked? Now that is idiotic.
    "You should know not to believe everything in media & polls by now !"


    John539 2-12-14 Post 15030
  • pendulum
    pendulum Posts: 2,302 Forumite
    What a load of nonsense. A lie is a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive. It is not a statement made based on ignorance of the true facts.

    That's the first definition you've lifted from Dictionary.com, but what about the other definitions?

    1. a false statement made with deliberate intent to deceive; an intentional untruth; a falsehood.

    2. something intended or serving to convey a false impression; imposture: His flashy car was a lie that deceived no one.

    3. an inaccurate or false statement.

    4. the charge or accusation of lying: He flung the lie back at his accusers.
  • Sgt_Pepper_2
    Sgt_Pepper_2 Posts: 3,644 Forumite
    mikey72 wrote: »
    If a copper really is that ignnorant, hopefully they'll assign him to school crossings, or just sack him for being an idiot.

    So you want him sacked on the ops say so?

    Good job vax doesn't claim the police told him about insurance.
  • Norman_Castle
    Norman_Castle Posts: 11,871 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Photogenic Name Dropper
    As a minimum legal requirement, motorists must be able to read a numberplate from a distance of 20.5 metres (67 feet) and have a 120 degree wide field of view. ...
    It would be useful if drivers could check this themselves. A numberplate on a wall and a mark on the ground at the correct distance at shopping centres or supermarkets would be cheap an easy.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 351.2K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.7K Spending & Discounts
  • 244.2K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 599.2K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177K Life & Family
  • 257.6K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.