6.4 people chasing every job

custardy

LadyMissA wrote: »

they dont? Then how have all the job come about that are advertised? These are not all new jobs they are from people leaving.

do you work?

bungle4by4

custardy wrote: »

nonsense
many employers don't replace leavers or replace them on part time

ummm, i'd like to see the evidence to back that one up. or does many mean 4?

LadyMissA

custardy wrote: »

do you work?

Is that a trick question? No, I think you will find I was made redundant some time ago.

Googlewhacker

custardy wrote: »

nonsense
many employers don't replace leavers or replace them on part time

Ok, not everyjob gets replaced but the majority will do

custardy

LadyMissA wrote: »

Is that a trick question? No, I think you will find I was made redundant some time ago.

redundant
hmmm,so no job created when you left?
most people i know/speak to will tell you their employer is keeping staffing low and not replacing leavers
the simplistic argument of a person leaving creates a job, is false.

LadyMissA

custardy wrote: »

redundant
hmmm,so no job created when you left?
most people i know/speak to will tell you their employer is keeping staffing low and not replacing leavers
the simplistic argument of a person leaving creates a job, is false.

I wasn't a leaver I was made redundant. If the company I was working for were doing well and I was a leaver I would have been replaced like the person who left 8 mths after me as his role was NOT made redundant he was replaced.

Leaving and redundant are not the same thing. All the jobs I apply for are there as someone has left.

custardy

LadyMissA wrote: »

I wasn't a leaver I was made redundant. If the company I was working for were doing well and I was a leaver I would have been replaced like the person who left 8 mths after me as his role was NOT made redundant he was replaced.

Leaving and redundant are not the same thing. All the jobs I apply for are there as someone has left.

what,no increase in staff requirements?
again,are you saying every person leaving a job is replaced?
and if so on the same hours?

LadyMissA

custardy wrote: »

what,no increase in staff requirements?
again,are you saying every person leaving a job is replaced?
and if so on the same hours?

how would there be an increase in staff requirements? If the work is going down too.

Like I keep saying leaving is not the same as redundancy. Companies like my old one who bring in a new accounts system that partly makes the invoice processing automated do not need new staff and that's one of the reasons they got it. Plus the loss of business.

If a job IS advertised then of course they are replacing the previous person.

custardy

LadyMissA wrote: »

how would there be an increase in staff requirements? If the work is going down too.

Like I keep saying leaving is not the same as redundancy. Companies like my old one who bring in a new accounts system that partly makes the invoice processing automated do not need new staff and that's one of the reasons they got it. Plus the loss of business.

If a job IS advertised then of course they are replacing the previous person.

deary me
so you cant see that businesses could need to increase staff levels?

LadyMissA

custardy wrote: »

deary me
so you cant see that businesses could need to increase staff levels?

not if it's a job to REPLACE someone, no. All the interviews I have had were to replace someone. This has nothing to do with the topic.