We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Renewables: "talking 'bout my generation"
Options
Comments
-
Checked our numbers last night and already with 4 months to go have beaten the SAP2009 numbers on our MCS certificate.
MCS: 2479 kWh
Actual: 2515 kWh (Nov 2011 to Aug 2012)
3kWp panels, SE England, SSW facing
With the additional 180kWh in August if the inverter had been working we would be way over.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
probably worth stating whether its Climate-SAF or Classic PVGIS
I'm sure people use both, so it gets confusing
Valid point, it was Classic PVGIS. For our location though the difference is only 60kWh/year (Climate-SAF is the higher of the two).
I ran our system stats through the calculator again, and I'm getting different results than 12-odd months ago when I first ran our system through. Although Google Maps now plots our postcode slightly more accurately than last year, the difference does not account for the result. The main difference seems to be the temperature losses, which I've no explanation for the difference:
Solar radiation database used: PVGIS-classic (Result on 7th Sept 2012):
Nominal power of the PV system: 3.7 kW (crystalline silicon)
Estimated losses due to temperature: 7.6% (using local ambient temperature)
Estimated loss due to angular reflectance effects: 2.9%
Other losses (cables, inverter etc.): 14.0%
Combined PV system losses: 22.9%
Total for year: 3200kWh
Solar radiation database used: PVGIS-classic (Results late 2011)
Nominal power of the PV system: 3.7 kW (crystalline silicon)
Estimated losses due to temperature: 11.9% (using local ambient temperature)
Estimated loss due to angular reflectance effects: 3%
Other losses (cables, inverter etc.): 14%
Combined PV system losses: 26.5%
Total for year: 3060kWh
So it looks like I need to update my spreadsheet with slightly higher PVGIS targets for each month. We've still exceeded PVGIS (Classic) by 8.2% since installation.
Has anyone else noticed a difference between PVGIS classic calculations now versus last year or older?Cider Country Solar PV generator: 3.7kWp Enfinity system on unshaded SE (-36deg azimuth) & 45deg roof0 -
yeah last Jan my estimate for PVGIS_SAF was 4030
now, its 3850
PVGIS have apparently added June 2010-end 2011 data to Climate-SAF PVGIS! (look in news section)
http://re.jrc.ec.europa.eu/pvgis/index.htm
the data was added in Feb
most parts of UK irradiance has increased so I dont know why my estimate is now lower
on the plus side, my spreadsheet looks better0 -
Checked our numbers last night and already with 4 months to go have beaten the SAP2009 numbers on our MCS certificate.
Ah thanks for the tip, hadn't noticed the MCS certificate had the SAP estimate.
So our SAP estimate is 2951kWh, versus PVGIS-Classic 3200kWh & PVGIS-Climate-SAF 3260kWh.
Generation so far 3055kWh as of yesterday with 44 days to go to anniversary.Cider Country Solar PV generator: 3.7kWp Enfinity system on unshaded SE (-36deg azimuth) & 45deg roof0 -
PVGIS have apparently added June 2010-end 2011 data to Climate-SAF PVGIS! (look in news section)
Hmm but PVGIS-Classic database hasn't changed so that doesn't explain my difference in results.Cider Country Solar PV generator: 3.7kWp Enfinity system on unshaded SE (-36deg azimuth) & 45deg roof0 -
sly_dog_jonah wrote: »Hmm but PVGIS-Classic database hasn't changed so that doesn't explain my difference in results.
dunno
I just noticed that Climate PVGIS had changed
its the more accurate one anyway0 -
Checked our numbers last night and already with 4 months to go have beaten the SAP2009 numbers on our MCS certificate.
MCS: 2479 kWh
Actual: 2515 kWh (Nov 2011 to Aug 2012)
3kWp panels, SE England, SSW facing
With the additional 180kWh in August if the inverter had been working we would be way over.
Good news.
Pointless SAP figures again! Standardising the UK doesn't work with a 20% difference or so N v's S, plus local weather conditions. Presumably you'd expect 3,000(ish)?
Mart.Mart. Cardiff. 8.72 kWp PV systems (2.12 SSW 4.6 ESE & 2.0 WNW). 20kWh battery storage. Two A2A units for cleaner heating. Two BEV's for cleaner driving.
For general PV advice please see the PV FAQ thread on the Green & Ethical Board.0 -
Martyn1981 wrote: »Good news.
Pointless SAP figures again! Standardising the UK doesn't work with a 20% difference or so N v's S, plus local weather conditions. Presumably you'd expect 3,000(ish)?
Mart.
Yes I'm hoping for just over 3000kWh for the full year. Might be a bit skewed now with the loss of generation in August but according to my estimates it was looking like 3200 so if the rest of the year goes to plan so may just squeak over the 3000kWh barrier anyway.
With the FITs and electricity savings it is looking very promising.Remember the saying: if it looks too good to be true it almost certainly is.0 -
Hi
10.35 kWh today. At 11.30 I had about 1kwh
Shafeeq0 -
Stopped generating a little early but got 11.62kWh so can't complain2kWp Solar PV - 10*200W Kioto, SMA Sunny Boy 2000HF, SSE facing, some shading in winter, 37° pitch, installed Jun-2011, inverter replaced Sep-2017 AND Feb-2022.0
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.1K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.2K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244.1K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.1K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177K Life & Family
- 257.5K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards