False benefit cheat claim by national press

DylanO

Decay wrote: »

:rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl::rotfl:



Dunno what planet you live on but obviously not the same as everyone else.

Proof of alien existence maybe ?:rotfl:

You obviously have a wealth of evidence against every newspaper to make such a post. I look forward to reading it all.

Dunroamin

OP, what benefits does your father claim and at what level?

jamespir

DylanO wrote: »

Do you have something more than vague riddles for me to go on? Why not just say what you mean the first time rather than alluding to things and giving barely any information?

i believ charlotte church as sued news internationl for posting some stuff that wasnt true about her mother

hugh grant is another one

googles your freind

DylanO

jamespir wrote: »

i believ charlotte church as sued news internationl for posting some stuff that wasnt true about her mother

hugh grant is another one

googles your freind

You believe incorrectly.

See here - http://www.guardian.co.uk/media/2012/feb/27/charlotte-church-phone-hacking-settled?newsfeed=true

Weary_soul

Oh god newspapers lie all the time. The Suns been guilty of twisting the truth god knows how many times.

Anyone remember what they published about Hilsborough?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/apr/18/hillsborough-anniversary-sun-newspaper

The people of Liverpool still haven't forgiven them.

DylanO

Weary_soul wrote: »

Oh god newspapers lie all the time. The Suns been guilty of twisting the truth god knows how many times.

Anyone remember what they published about Hilsborough?

http://www.guardian.co.uk/football/2009/apr/18/hillsborough-anniversary-sun-newspaper

The people of Liverpool still haven't forgiven them.

So do people - more so. Especially when they can get something out of it. It's when they're caught that they begin to worry.

Weary_soul

Sadly you have no idea what the OP has done, so It's just spiteful speculation on your part.

DylanO

Weary_soul wrote: »

Sadly you have no idea what the OP has done, so It's just spiteful speculation on your part.

I know exactly what the OP has done, but her actions are not in question here. Her father's are. A man who consented to give a journalist an interview, and now his daughter wishes to prevent that interview from being published.

If we go by the objective facts then we can guess exactly why she wishes to prevent publication, and that's only from the information she has given us. I suspect there is a lot more that she hasn't said.

I repeat my earlier statements - if he has done nothing wrong, then he has nothing to fear.

Weary_soul

Again all speculation on YOUR part. The 'Scum' is well know for printing lies about all sorts of things, and as I said bloody great swathes of Liverpool will never forgive them for the filth they spread all those years ago. So hardly quality press, eh?

I repeat my earlier statements - if he has done nothing wrong, then he has nothing to fear.

And If you believe that you'll believe anything....

vax2002

If he is as disabled as you say, they wont have any photographs of him doing anything he claims he can not do.
So what is there to worry about ?