We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Sale of Goods act vs Vodafone
Comments
-
Eefee needs to go down a legal route to show this eitherway.0
-
Firstly I have skipped many of the posts.
Your phone has become faulty,
2 things that come to mind.
firstly the phone is within a rental agreement and therefore the contract states that you have a handset with the phone, and therefore if the phone is not working and the company do not want to repair it, you can refuse to pay the bill (not recommended). However you are intitled to a repair or a replacement in this case. It is as you rent a house, if the heating does not work, why should you pay the rent.
secondly the SAGA is your friend, there is something in law that says a phone should last you a reasonable time. a woman in the Which magazine took comet to court as they wouldnt refund her 3 year old washing machine. She then got her money back and also money for time wasted.
I am still awaiting my reply from Vodafone, I am going to have to sue them in court.0 -
alistair.long wrote: »firstly the phone is within a rental agreement0
-
Vodafone has supplied goods for use with a service which it also supplies. The goods were supplied at the agreed price on condition of the purchase of the service at an agreed price; the two are interpendent. Therefore the supply of the goods is governed by the Supply of Goods and Services Act 1982 of which Sections 11N and 18(3)(e) are relevant in this case.
In all my communications with Vodafone and the Ombudsman, I have referred to the SOGA not the SOGASA.
Will I need to go through the whole complaints process again referring to the SOGASA?0 -
-
Nice one. Thanks for all your help0
-
Do you do No Win No Fee?
Fancy taking on Vodafone?0 -
don't know if its to late but take a look at this: http://www.adviceguide.org.uk/index/c_mobile_phones.pdf
Replacement or repair
[FONT=Arial,Arial][FONT=Arial,Arial]
If you bought the phone on or after 31 March 2003, you can ask the seller to replace or repair it free of charge if it is faulty. If you do this within six months of receiving the phone, it will be assumed that the problem existed when you bought it, unless the seller can show otherwise. However, you can still ask for a replacement or a repair for up to six years from the date that you bought the phone, if it is reasonable for it to have lasted that long. In this case it will be up to you to show that the phone was faulty at the time of sale. The longer you have had the phone, the more difficult it becomes to prove that it was faulty at the time of sale.
If
[/FONT]
[/FONT]:
it is impossible to replace or repair the phone; or
a replacement or repair would be unreasonably costly for the seller when compared with alternative remedies; or
the seller fails to replace or repair the phone within a reasonable time of having agreed to do so or causes you significant inconvenience; or
the phone has worked for some time before it goes wrong or only one of its functions has gone wrong
then:
[/FONT][/FONT]Debt Free since 23rd October 2008 :heart2:0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351.5K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.3K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.9K Spending & Discounts
- 244.5K Work, Benefits & Business
- 599.8K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 177.2K Life & Family
- 258.1K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.2K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards