It wasn't me! An apology!

DylanO

I don't believe a word of this. As has been shown you posted the same views (which you claim not to have) in January, and on the same thread in the daytime.

I don't know why you posted such a horrible post but I'm glad it was deleted and I'm sure you're only trying to do damage control now. The lies have backfired.

pukkamum

DylanO wrote: »

I don't believe a word of this. As has been shown you posted the same views (which you claim not to have) in January, and on the same thread in the daytime.

I don't know why you posted such a horrible post but I'm glad it was deleted and I'm sure you're only trying to do damage control now. The lies have backfired.

i'm done now DylanO if you don't want to believe me fair enough that is your perogative, yes i do think for me staying at home is best and it saddens me that for a lot of mum's it isn't but i would never deliberately upset someone, i have explained myself fully and as you can see from my post in January i have no issue with working mum's it's just not for me.

Seanymph

pukkamum wrote: »

Seanymph wrote: »

I'll check again, but all I could see was a post from yourself saying you'd sent pm's to two members.

It fell short of the apology and explanation given on here.

I didn't post because I care what people think of you after last night - I posted because you are apologising which implies you do. As someone who read both it would be more applicable to have a full explanation publicly on the thread it concerned, so any readers would have immediate access to your sister story.

A seperate thread often isn't read by the same audience.

Of course you may still be your 'long standing' and 'nanny for many years' sister in which case you don't want an observers feedback on how to limit the damage...[/QUOTE/]

I will put a link into the other thread seanmyph if it worries you that much!

It worries me not a jot. I thought I'd already made that clear. But if you wish to convince people that you aren't the nasty piece of work that was so insensitive and brutal to other members last night then I am of the opinion that the thread where the abusive posts occurred would be a better place for the apology.

Of course this way you get a different audience - but the same audience would make the apology more convincing.

You started the thread by stating you wished to apologise and set it straight that you aren't the same member who was short tempered and dismissive yesterday - strange that you are refusing to see my point which is in support of your putting that right.

You have a lot of time, and a lot of posts invested in the site, obviously you are a long term user - therefore you know the dynamics of forums, rather than putting that you'd 'sent pm's' on the thread you would be more believeable if you posted the explanation under the posts that caused others distressed.

But like I say, it won't affect my day any whatever you do

Moneybot

Seanymph wrote: »

pukkamum wrote: »

But like I say, it won't affect my day any whatever you do

As clearly shown by the number of times you have posted on the thread! Nope not bothering you at all in no way and anyone who implies other wise is just wrong or has a sister who is wrong

Wickedkitten

Why on earth would your sister type something like

DylanO as you can see i am a long time member of this site and am well aware of the rules, this does not mean i cannot give my opinion, i am not spoiling for a fight i am standing by my opinion.

Completely with the same style of writing that you do?

Seanymph

Moneybot wrote: »

Seanymph wrote: »

As clearly shown by the number of times you have posted on the thread! Nope not bothering you at all in no way and anyone who implies other wise is just wrong or has a sister who is wrong

I think it's interesting - but it doesn't worry me.

duchy

Hmmm

The OP wants to make this into a drama it appears by starting another thread -Not convinced either but not losing any sleep over it either. Perhaps it was a case of posting after a couple of glasses of wine ?

victory

Recently we keep getting apologies for every thread started, maybe goes wrong and then the next day aplogies, like the other one with the two spatting ladies who were with the same man and now this one.

Whether the sister did it or not, how come the sister was able to use the laptop and not asked what she was doing? When did the sister admit that she posted the posts in the threads? If it was last night was it not proper to apologize last night? Why wait until morning? Why start a fight on here and then go 'oh no not me guv, not me'?

victory

Oh right just seen that the sis sent the text this morning so no could not have been apologizing last night.

It makes you wonder though if all it takes is an apology once you have deeply upset and offended someone can I not just say that so and so is a "£$£$R$%^^& and a %$&&^**&( but that is ok because tomorrow i will retract or say it was my budgie who is just learning to type?:rotfl::D

Person_one

duchy wrote: »

Perhaps it was a case of posting after a couple of glasses of wine ?

I'm sure a few of us have been guilty of that from time time! However 'in vino veritas' and all that...