EXTENDED: You've got another week to add your travel & holiday deals questions for expert MSE Oli as part of the latest Ask An Expert event.
MSE News: Government shrugs off Lords benefits defeat

1.7K Posts



This is the discussion thread for the following MSE News Story:
"Coalition plans to cap benefits will be implemented "in full despite a stinging defeat in the Lords ..."
"Coalition plans to cap benefits will be implemented "in full despite a stinging defeat in the Lords ..."
0
This discussion has been closed.
Latest MSE News and Guides
Replies
I think one solution that would be workable is to continue to taper child benefit for multiple children. Would only work without causing poverty if you started for children born in a year's time and onwards.
But currently you get £20.30 for your first child and £13.40 for subsequent children. I.e. you get £6.90 less for your second than your first. Why not make it that you get £6.90 less for your third than you do for your second? So you get £6.50 for your third. And nothing for subsequent children.
This would hit families like ours as we have 4 children, but I do think it would be fair.
CB isn't the only way a household can get mega sums; your forgetting Housing Benefit which in my view should also be capped alongside new legislation putting a ceiling on rents that can be obtained from Social Tenants.
Like your CB suggestion though!
If they try to block welfare cuts then they are basically saying taxes have to go up - something the Lords have no right to do ("no taxation without representation"). And as the article states they are way out of line with public opinion.
It sickens me seeing single mothers of many children are living and expecting the lifestyle of a middle/high class person, all given away because they had those children! Over christmas, I witnessed one splashing out on a new TV and entertainment system for the kids to watch christmas TV (!), and the month before bought a fancy car.
Let's look at the bigger picture of population control though and see we are doing our planet no favours.
This recognises each person, male or female, has a right to reproduce, but any more leads to population melt down.
An interesting trick is to make it a tax deduction, as opposed to an actual payment. This means even poor people wll be forced to file their taxes, which will trigger a tax refund. If you want your money, you have to file your taxes. End of late filing for HMRC.
One tax return, one child benefit.
Are you claiming Child Benefit? [Yes] [No]
Name of Child? [_______________________]
Relation? [Son] [Daughter]
Name of other parent? [___________________________]
Are you claiming half and half*? [Yes] [No]
*Half and half means the child benefit is split between both parent equally.
The Govt deems everyone earning £40k to be on a high wage and takes 40% tax on earnings above it and is planning on removing child benefit to those above the threshold figure. Surely if working families are seen to be earning a high wage at £40k (before petrol costs, school dinners, prescriptions etc etc), then surely getting £35k for doing nothing is massive.
Yes I accept that some families may have to move to cheaper areas - tough! Working families have to. Many London commuters have to pay huge train fares every day because they can't afford to live in the city.
Some children whose families are living on benefits might have to do without the latest phone, game and their parents without ciggies, booze and the bingo - again tough!
Harsh - yes : Unfair - no.
I have to search out yellow-stickered food, tell my kids we can't afford stuff they want and be careful when the heating gets put on despite my husband and I both working to support the family. Do we get any 'help'? No way. Can we ask for a pay rise? No. Do we have to get on with it? Yes.
I might sound bitter. I am. Not that we have to penny-pinch, but that others seem to think it their right to be given (out of money we have taken from us), more than we earn.
I am sure that there are those of you who think my views are out of order, but times are a-changing, and about time too! The Welfare State is a wonderful concept but it is also antiquated and un-workable in its present format. Deal with less money or go get a job. And no, I don't believe many are trying hard enough. People who don't have English as a first language can manage it.
Rant over. Bring on the lefties!
My 10c: I think the max benefit should not exceed the minimum public sector wage. Forget the 'average income' figure, that includes bankers and MP wages so isn't representative of the real world.
gav
Personally, I think the bishops have got it wrong. Nobody has children just for Child Benefit, it's the expensive London rents which have to be paid for that is the real issue here and the bulk of the £35/26k. When people are moaning that they will be 'uprooted' if they have to move to cheaper areas e.g. The North, what's holding them to their current locations?