We'd like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum... Read More »
We're aware that some users are experiencing technical issues which the team are working to resolve. See the Community Noticeboard for more info. Thank you for your patience.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!
Please help
Options
Comments
-
Infact, I would imagine you bought it a month or so before the wedding. With all the fittings you'd have had I'd suggest it's fair to say you're period of acceptance had passed so i don't really see why she'd offer you a refund anyway!0
-
Because it wasn't fit for purposeOne important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0
-
Were you boobs adequately supported, perhaps your claim is against the brassiere company?0
-
I also agree with thatOne important thing to remember is that when you get to the end of this sentence, you'll realise it's just my sig.0
-
halibut2209 wrote: »Because it wasn't fit for purpose
Which means she's entitled to a remedy - which isn't necessarily a refund and the retailer can choose the most cost-effective option, likely being a repair.0 -
Given its a 1 day outfit...some might say you've had 50% or more use based on the fact it lasted as long as it did (if you got through the ceremony) which would entitle you to a 50%
I am surprised a new bride would want to get a refund on a dress knowing that she has no further need for it and will lose the sentimental part of it...strikes me as well, odd.
I came on here for advice, with all due respect when I purchased my wedding dress I didn't look for a dress that would last 2 hours, as appreciative as I am that it lasted the ceremony, should I be grateful after paying £1000? I received the dress a day before not a months and regardless it was a wedding dress for my wedding day.
Thank you to the people that have replied with understanding, I am not 'odd' I was simply wondering what my rights were, not looking for people to be funny with me.0 -
People have told you you're probably not entitled to a refund, just because that's not what you want to hear doesn't make them wrong.
Rather than whining about the advice, take it and accept the repair.0 -
Not whining simply wondering why I am deemed as 'odd' when a £1000 dress broke on the most important day I will ever have and i am gutted about it? wasnt a Friday night out, it was my wedding day.
But hey as I said thanks for the advice.0 -
I can understand the frustration, I really can. I just don't see how they can remedy it, I think a refund is too much but a repair is adequate.
It's just my opinion, and the post before my previous just sounded a little like you were disregarding advice as it wasn't what you wanted to hear, I must have picked up on it wrong.
Best of luck getting it resolved though.0 -
Not whining simply wondering why I am deemed as 'odd' when a £1000 dress broke on the most important day I will ever have and i am gutted about it? wasnt a Friday night out, it was my wedding day.
But hey as I said thanks for the advice.
The problem is op, the law is the same irrespective of whether the item is designed for use for one day or for 1 year. You are entitled to a remedy -- but not necessarily a refund.
You may have also had a case for recovering any losses incurred as a result of the dress failing -- however you've mentioned none.0
This discussion has been closed.
Confirm your email address to Create Threads and Reply

Categories
- All Categories
- 351K Banking & Borrowing
- 253.1K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
- 453.6K Spending & Discounts
- 244K Work, Benefits & Business
- 598.9K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
- 176.9K Life & Family
- 257.3K Travel & Transport
- 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
- 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
- 37.6K Read-Only Boards