PLEASE READ BEFORE POSTING: Hello Forumites! In order to help keep the Forum a useful, safe and friendly place for our users, discussions around non-MoneySaving matters are not permitted per the Forum rules. While we understand that mentioning house prices may sometimes be relevant to a user's specific MoneySaving situation, we ask that you please avoid veering into broad, general debates about the market, the economy and politics, as these can unfortunately lead to abusive or hateful behaviour. Threads that are found to have derailed into wider discussions may be removed. Users who repeatedly disregard this may have their Forum account banned. Please also avoid posting personally identifiable information, including links to your own online property listing which may reveal your address. Thank you for your understanding.
📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Section 21

1121314151618»

Comments

  • prudryden
    prudryden Posts: 2,075 Forumite
    I have been trying to get a definitive answer re: the advantages/disadvantages of issuing a s21 at the beginning of a tenancy. So far, no luck! What I have found out is that you have to be very careful to get it right. There is also some question whether a judge would see it as contradictory i.e. on one hand you are telling the tenant glad to have you, on the other hand I want you to leave. Sinton Andrews and Winkworths have told me that they do not issue S21 at the start because of this contradictory possibility.

    At the moment, I am going to err on not issuing a S21 until I need it.
    FREEDOM IS NOT FREE
  • Ok first off sorry to reserect this from the dead but I just wanted to get your views on some possible S21 situations.

    I read on another forum here the following post:

    Had an interesting conversation with my father in law about the S21 issue. As a district judge, he deals with these frequently. And I'm afraid it's not good news. In other areas such as late payment of rent, judges are entitled to some discretion. But in the case of S21 notices the law is very clear - if a valid S21 has been served, the court has no option but to uphold it. Discussions about renewal, even in writing, have no impact on the validity of the notice. The only thing that will work is a new tenancy agreement.

    This seems to contradict to other information on this MSE thread that states only a confirmation of not wanting you to leave would be enough to invalidate the s21.

    Also what is the LL gave writen permission that you could stay but put "Without predjudice" at the top would this be admissable if you went to court?
    If freedom is outlawed, only outlaws will have freedom.
  • This is a very good question ! Expert please (sound of clicking fingers !)
    No Links in Signatures by Site Rules - MSE Forum Team 2
  • coal9011
    coal9011 Posts: 208 Forumite
    Babe ruth. there is no point issuing a Section 21 at the start of the tenancy, only when you want to give your tenant notice to leave.

    You can only issue it 4 months into the tenancy. Best to get a good tenancy agreement signed first! In any event, if a landlord asked me to acknowledge a Section 21 notice just as I was about to move in, I would tell him to sod-off and find myself another property to let. It's like asking the tenant to leave before he's even moved in! :mad:
  • franklee
    franklee Posts: 3,867 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 1,000 Posts Photogenic
    This seems to contradict to other information on this MSE thread

    Thanks for pointing this out, very interesting! It does indeed contradict the information in this thread, particularly from me :) But the credibility of the source isn't verified. Also we do not know specifically the questions asked. An S21 is a mandatory ground but only if it is valid. I would like to quiz the poster on exactly what was said and get a bit more detail, is that possible? It may well be that S21 notices are rarely challenged on this basis as not many tenants would realise to attempt it or that some of the detail has got lost in writing up the original conversation.

    Marveen Smith has written about this:

    http://www.painsmith.co.uk/painsmithfiles/articles/termination.doc

    Page 5:

    8.If the landlord agrees to the tenant extending the tenancy for say a
    week or ten days after the section 21 Notice expires then the Notice
    will be void and would have to be served again. Never agree an extension
    for a short period of time without the consent of the landlord, and
    warning him his Notice would be void.

    9.If the landlord or agent writes offering to extend the tenancy any
    Section 21 Notice served prior to the letter or at the same time as the
    letter will be technically void, as there is a conflict between the two
    actions.

    Painsmith specialise solely in Landlord and Tenant Law:
    http://www.painsmith.co.uk/

    Certainly that's enough reason to challenge the S21, so at the very least the landlord is taking a pretty big risk if he does give out contradictory instructions to the tenant. That said I'm convinced by Marveen, anything else just doesn't make sense.

  • Ok thanks for that info. So it seems that the poster I quoted from may have been mistaken or just trying to wind people up, either way there was never a response to questions posed to him according to other posts I have seen there.

    But what about the second part of my question, marking a letter giving you permission to stay "Without predjudice" would it still be admissible in court?

    Does anyone have a link to the actually wording of the law regarding s21 and the housing act, as this should also tell us what makes s21 invalid. If a case ever went to court this could be quoted to the judge if he mistakenly believes an s21 can only be invalidated by a new contract.
    If freedom is outlawed, only outlaws will have freedom.
  • Guy_Montag
    Guy_Montag Posts: 2,291 Forumite
    1,000 Posts Combo Breaker

    But what about the second part of my question, marking a letter giving you permission to stay "Without prejudice" would it still be admissible in court?
    Probably, yes. I think is the answer. Have a read of this:

    Legal Factsheet

    As far as I can understand it there has to be a dispute before an offer can be made "without prejudice" - if the LL is writing to say you can stay on there is no dispute.

    More technical analysis here

    Does anyone have a link to the actually wording of the law regarding s21 and the housing act, as this should also tell us what makes s21 invalid. If a case ever went to court this could be quoted to the judge if he mistakenly believes an s21 can only be invalidated by a new contract.

    Section 21 Details
    "Mrs. Pench, you've won the car contest, would you like a triumph spitfire or 3000 in cash?" He smiled.
    Mrs. Pench took the money. "What will you do with it all? Not that it's any of my business," he giggled.
    "I think I'll become an alcoholic," said Betty.
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 350.6K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 453.3K Spending & Discounts
  • 243.6K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 598.3K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 176.7K Life & Family
  • 256.7K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16.1K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.6K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.