We’d like to remind Forumites to please avoid political debate on the Forum.

This is to keep it a safe and useful space for MoneySaving discussions. Threads that are – or become – political in nature may be removed in line with the Forum’s rules. Thank you for your understanding.

📨 Have you signed up to the Forum's new Email Digest yet? Get a selection of trending threads sent straight to your inbox daily, weekly or monthly!

Refunding onto same payment card

12345679»

Comments

  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    texranger wrote: »
    consumer law says you are entitled to a refund, it is up to the retailer how they refund you if the original card is not present as merchant service agreements are legal documents/contracts which are governed by law.

    But only between the merchant and the card processors, not the consumer.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    bris wrote: »
    As a retailer I can assure you if you don't have the original card then it is a credit note, the law allows this and you will lose it you took it to court, no if's but's or maybe. Trading standards will also tell you this so ask them.
    It would be helpful if you were able to point to which law this refers to.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    No the first point isn't anything to do with the store - it's to do with the card companies who won't allow the store to refund transactions on different cards.

    The second point is to do with the customer because if the store flout the card companies rules then the stores banking will be affected and there may end up being no store if their system for accepting card payments is terminated.

    One party cannot be liable for agreements made between two other parties. The agreements made between the retailer and the merchant services company has nothing whatsoever to do with the consumer.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    texranger wrote: »
    this is why stores give gift vouchers/cards. thease are not classed as credit notes so you cant refuse.

    Since when? That is exactly what they are.
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • Flyboy152
    Flyboy152 Posts: 17,118 Forumite
    texranger wrote: »
    oh i will inform Trading Standards that you know best

    also

    Trading Standards deal primarily with Consumber affairs
    OFT deal primarily with B2B affairs

    one of my store managers is ex TS so he knows consumer laws.

    What?????

    ...
    The greater danger, for most of us, lies not in setting our aim too high and falling short; but in setting our aim too low and achieving our mark
  • unholyangel
    unholyangel Posts: 16,866 Forumite
    Part of the Furniture 10,000 Posts Name Dropper
    I have to agree i dont see gift cards/vouchers as not being a credit note.

    Let us not forget that the purpose of the SoGA is to put the consumer either:

    - In the position they would be in if the contract had been performed correctly or;
    - In the position they would be in had the contract not existed.

    Vouchers/Credit note/Gift card does not satisfy either of these although imo a cheque would.

    Of course if the retailer is refunding due to goodwill and not statutory rights, they are free to offer their own terms of how the refund would be issued. That being said, i dont find it unreasonable for a shop to refuse to refund back to a different card. Perhaps if we were all 100% honest then it would be different, but we're not. There are conmen and I dont blame shops for trying to protect themselves from this, after all, if they didnt try to protect themselves they would either go bankrupt or their prices would be sky high to take into account the loss adjustment.
    You keep using that word. I do not think it means what you think it means - Inigo Montoya, The Princess Bride
This discussion has been closed.
Meet your Ambassadors

🚀 Getting Started

Hi new member!

Our Getting Started Guide will help you get the most out of the Forum

Categories

  • All Categories
  • 352.5K Banking & Borrowing
  • 253.7K Reduce Debt & Boost Income
  • 454.5K Spending & Discounts
  • 245.5K Work, Benefits & Business
  • 601.5K Mortgages, Homes & Bills
  • 177.6K Life & Family
  • 259.5K Travel & Transport
  • 1.5M Hobbies & Leisure
  • 16K Discuss & Feedback
  • 37.7K Read-Only Boards

Is this how you want to be seen?

We see you are using a default avatar. It takes only a few seconds to pick a picture.